SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Blue Ninjakoopa

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Result: RfR passed. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Blue Ninjakoopa (1)[edit]

Hai der, everyone. I'm Blue Ninjakoopa, also known as BNK or Blue 13.png Before I start, I'd like to say that I am somewhat requesting this because almost all of my friends have it. I figured I could give it a go, as I know how to deal with vandals. My edit count is average, and I have kept my cool for about 4 days. I made a forum apologizing about my recent actions, by the way. I have put my fair share of deletion tags on articles and I have reported much vandalism to Clarinet Hawk. Today I reverted an edit by an IP that suggested Falcon got his moveset from one of Kirby's copy abilities, so yeah.

I'd really like to have this status, so I can aid my fellow Smash Wikians in this seemingly never-ending war between users and vandal IPs. For those who will support me, I thank you, but for those that oppose, please note that I will accept your reason. I can also mean srs bsns, and I don't get why some think it's a bad thing to mean both hmrs bsns and srs bsns. On a side note, rollback would make an excellent present for the holidays Smile.gif Blue Ninjakoopa Happy Holidays 04:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


  • Strong Support. You're active, a conscientious contributor, and you don't vandalize. You've earned these powers. - GalaxiaD (Happy Holidays!) 04:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. See all of Pikamanders votes. JtM =^] (talk) 05:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Slight Support. see JtM's vote, but you can be a little...... temperamental. Xtrme Silver and Gold! 05:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Honestly, I can't see you misusing this, and your a decent contributor most of the time. --Toon GanondorfCHAT 05:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. A great user, great at fighting vandalism, great at improving the wiki. ROllback would be well deserved. --GutripperSpeak if you are worthy 05:50, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. He's very active, and means well. Can get agitated at times, but I can forgive him. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 06:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • XTREME Support, Mah Boi. You would make an AWESOME rollback. You watch vandals more than I watch TV. ParaGoomba348 14:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. An occasional temper problem, but mostly a good anti-vandal and that's what counts here. Miles (talk) 15:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." Temper doesn't matter here, only anti-vandal skills. --Shadowcrest 20:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Basically what everyone else says. You deserve this, you future-rollback'r! Friedbeef1 Ho ho ho! 21:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Is great when it comes to fighting vandalism; I mean, nobody wants to see their work tarnished by others. Baltro [ talk ] 00:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 14:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - I don't need a reason. 'Tis already been said above. "Handsome" Hollywood K. 21:35, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • You go girl: go for it! If i gave a reason i would be repeating everything that was said above. PikabroPIKACHU! 22:44, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Come on, do I really have to explain? I'm pretty much with Shadowcrest (no offense, BNK). He's a very active user, and whenever he's here, I never see him make any bad edits. Plus, we're good friends (strangely, we were born on the same day, but not same year), and he's always got my back with edits against vandalism. Good luck! MarioGalaxyTalk 23:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Support: Very active, has a friendly personality, knows what he is doing, and great at fighting vandalism. ^^ (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 05:06, 18 December 2008 (UTC))
  • Support You have a good number of reverts, so you should do good with this.SZL.pngUP/T 01:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Rollback revoked on 18:19, 25 January 2009

Result: The community wants to give you another chance. Don't blow it. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Blue Ninjakoopa (2)[edit]

Hi. I'm requesting rollback again because I lost it (intimidating behavior). I've returned to get it back, with the promise that I won't ever abuse it again. I know temper has nothing to do with rollback, so please don't bring that up. I want honest votes from all of you. Blue NinjakoopaTalk 07:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


  • Comment. Exactly why do you think that it is a good idea to request rollback the same day your ban ended and within a week of losing it for abusing it? Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 07:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
According to Shadowcrest, temper isn't a problem here; it's how active I am and how many reverts I have. Blue NinjakoopaTalk 07:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
That's a fair answer to my question. Enough that I'll stay neutral here and let the community be the judge. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose BNK is a rude user that loses his temper over nothing on a constant basis and has had these powers removed once before, and I have no doubt that it would happen again. He has promised several times before to not do it again, but I have stopped believing him. When he admits that his temper is his fault, not anyone elses, then I will change my vote. Toon Ganondorf (t c)
How about you find a real reason, Toon Ganondorf. I've never been rude to you at all. lol, I only promised once (this request), stop making up stuff just to try and make sure I don't get this ability. Blue NinjakoopaTalk 07:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
lol, you dumpkoff. I know my temper is my fault, it's simply helped. Change nao. Blue NinjakoopaTalk 12:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Temper didn't help KP, if you recall. Despite the fact that you have suddenly hated me for no reason, I still think that you deserve Rollback. TG will be cross that I chose you over him, but Support. GutripperSpeak
I thought KP lost adminship because of his temper? Blue NinjakoopaTalk 07:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
He failed rollback three times because of temper too. GutripperSpeak
Actually, it was because he didn't adhere to policy.Smoreking(T) (c) 13:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Cut it out with this friendship bs. "TG will be cross that I chose you over him"? Learn to wiki. When you get involved in a conversation, throw your friendships out the window as long as the topic is being discussed. You [Gutripper] shouldn't change your ideas because your friends disagree, and your friends shouldn't take a disagreement personally. Friendships have no place as far as wiki is concerned- please prevent them from influencing yours or anyone's opinion. --Shadowcrest 18:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Actually, it didn't. I went against him. That's my point. It didn't influence me. GutripperSpeak
The fact that it was even mentioned shows that the problem still exists. I did not mean to single you or anyone out, just make everyone aware of the problem so they can correct it. --Shadowcrest 20:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Mild Support You have a decent amount of reverts, as I said last time. Although you can be temperamental, you are still a good contributor, and I can't really see rollback being used in an edit war anyway that simple undoing can't be.Smoreking(T) (c) 13:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Temper doesn't matter though :( Blue NinjakoopaTalk 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. This again? no reason to take it away when the person gets banned for intimidation. Xtrme Cupid Will Get You.... 17:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Support. I mean yeah, no doubt you'll do a good job, but I'm worried your temper will get the best of you again. Shade487z 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Neutral. You've got a decent number of reverts, but, frankly, I'm not willing to simply take you on your word that you won't abuse it again, especially seeing as how you just came off of a ban. If, over time, you prove that you're serious about being more srs, I'll reconsider my vote. On a side note, while temper (and, more generally, behavior), in of itself, isn't an issue, it is a legitimate concern in so far as it correlates to potential abuse. – Defiant Elements +talk 19:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
So that's how temper is involved? >_> Blue NinjakoopaTalk 19:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
In theory, yes. – Defiant Elements +talk 19:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Slight Support. Learn to keep your cool. Other than that, same reasons he was supported above and last time. Miles (talk) 20:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support: I'm sorta related to your ban...I did kinda troll you...I don't expect forgiveness, but I'll try to fix my mistakes. Besides, you fixed my page about a million times.Silvie (talk) 21:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Support The fact remains that he can be the biggest ass in the world. As long as he keeps it off the Wiki, his temper has no influence. Kperfekt722 These Rules Are Stupid 21:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
XD For that, I award you ten bakies. Blue NinjakoopaTalk 00:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support He is a good user that I think has made a lot of reverts. He has also made many edits, and he is someone I could trust. - Luca3 (talk) 23:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Neutral leaning to oppose Well if u hav got it 3 times already we know that you will prove to be a good user and use i well but the fact that you repeatedly lost it for the same reson obviously means that you have not yet learned your lesson and we are left with the question of if you deserve it again PikabroPIKACHU! 05:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Actually, he's got it once, and lost it once. Be reasonable. GutripperSpeak
  • Support Same for his previous Rfr. Friedbeef1 Love 23:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: Passed. Shadowcrest 16:49, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Blue Ninjakoopa (3)[edit]

This is my third request for rollback. If you can take the time to study my contributions, you'll notice that, aside from the slightly sarcastic comments I make in edit summaries, I've been very calm and my edits are constructive. I'm also active daily, and I'm known to be one of the few users online (the others being janitors) in cases of extreme vandalism. Links to other pages regarding me can be found in my signature. Cordially, BNK [E|T|C] 04:33, May 29, 2010 (UTC)


  1. Strong Support a fine rollbacker before his ban, and never abused the privilege. Someone who can definitely be trusted, IMO. Kperfekt Talk Is Cheap... But I Am Not. 05:59, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Strong Support helped me battle a swarm of vandals once. I told you this would be remembered. I was waiting for this. Mr. Anon (talk) 16:39, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support. Made some mistakes a while ago, but has long since learned his lesson. He's a good contributor, and knows what he's doing. Miles (talk) 22:04, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support Same as above.--Megatron1 (talk) 18:58, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Support- He knows how to handle the tool, for sure. --HavocReaper'48 20:26, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Support Active contributor with a fair amount of reverts. I trust him to use the tool sensibly. Enigmatic Mr. L 21:02, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Support The same as everyone above. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 20:18, June 6, 2010 (UTC)