Category talk:Charizard (PM)

What exactly is the point of this category? And please stop making more of them until you can justify their existence, please. Miles (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2015 (EDT)

I saw a red link on the Category:Charizard players (PM) page so I figured I'd make it. Also wasn't there talk of creating a bunch of articles on attacks?--Dinodomain (talk) 16:48, 23 September 2015 (EDT)

What? Our PM coverage policy basically doesn't permit the existence of any page that would belong in this category other than the character pages themselves, which can just link directly to the professionals categories. These have no reason to exist. Miles (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2015 (EDT)

Did you miss the part where I asked you to "please stop making more"? I am fairly convinced I will have to go through and manually undo everything you're doing, and I'd appreciate it if you stopped until this is resolved. Miles (talk) 17:06, 23 September 2015 (EDT)

When you messaged me I was pretty done with every category so I figured I'd just finish them all instead of leaving a few undone, sorry about that. Anyhow I've read the PM policy, and it doesn't really say anything about Categories. Hey and if it is decided that these new categories shouldn't exist I'll undo everything I've done myself, don't worry about that.--Dinodomain (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2015 (EDT)

My point was we have no need for a category with one page and one subcategory. Miles (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2015 (EDT)

If nobody gives any more of a case why these should exist, I'm going to clear them out later today. Miles (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2015 (EDT)