User talk:69.242.39.232: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:


You jerks blocked me without a warning! AGAIN! You always block me without a warning! This time I only made ONE abusive edit, and I STILL DIDN'T GET A WARNING AND GOT BLOCKED BY FORCE! :'( [[Special:Contributions/69.242.39.232|69.242.39.232]] 14:08, 7 November 2018 (EST)
You jerks blocked me without a warning! AGAIN! You always block me without a warning! This time I only made ONE abusive edit, and I STILL DIDN'T GET A WARNING AND GOT BLOCKED BY FORCE! :'( [[Special:Contributions/69.242.39.232|69.242.39.232]] 14:08, 7 November 2018 (EST)
:To be quite frank:
:#We did not block by force; you did not change your behavior since the last time you appeared on the wiki, so you're blocked for the same reasons you were last time.
:#Technically speaking, we don't have to block with a warning, though in your case, we ''did'' tell you you were going against our policies, which, in and of itself, is a means to be blocked.
:#One abusive edit or ten, it doesn't matter. As I said before, you did the exact same thing that got you blocked in the first place.
:Perhaps you should take this time off to consider your actions, and come back to us when your block is up and be willing to help us, instead of complaining about information not given to us. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: orange;">'''the Thankful Rurouni'''</span>]] 18:16, 7 November 2018 (EST)

Latest revision as of 19:16, November 7, 2018

Regarding your comment on Talk:Unlockable character[edit]

SmashWiki's talk pages are mainly used for talking about the article's contents, eg. should it be split, fact checking, and conflicting edits. Your comment here doesn't contribute to the article and is in fact something that shouldn't be posted on talk pages. If you would like to learn about how talk pages work, please read SW:TALK. SugarCookie420 (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2018 (EDT)

You jerks blocked me without a warning! AGAIN! You always block me without a warning! This time I only made ONE abusive edit, and I STILL DIDN'T GET A WARNING AND GOT BLOCKED BY FORCE! :'( 69.242.39.232 14:08, 7 November 2018 (EST)

To be quite frank:
  1. We did not block by force; you did not change your behavior since the last time you appeared on the wiki, so you're blocked for the same reasons you were last time.
  2. Technically speaking, we don't have to block with a warning, though in your case, we did tell you you were going against our policies, which, in and of itself, is a means to be blocked.
  3. One abusive edit or ten, it doesn't matter. As I said before, you did the exact same thing that got you blocked in the first place.
Perhaps you should take this time off to consider your actions, and come back to us when your block is up and be willing to help us, instead of complaining about information not given to us. Aidan, the Thankful Rurouni 18:16, 7 November 2018 (EST)