Talk:Yacht Club Games: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
:I think this is the best thing to do. Giving each company their own page presents the same problem as the developer page issue a while ago. Every page would just be "This company developed or published x which is featured in y as an assist trophy."  [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 00:17, 8 February 2019 (EST)
:I think this is the best thing to do. Giving each company their own page presents the same problem as the developer page issue a while ago. Every page would just be "This company developed or published x which is featured in y as an assist trophy."  [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 00:17, 8 February 2019 (EST)
::I agree that all small companies use the one page, like the page of  minor universes.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 02:51, 8 February 2019 (EST)
::I agree that all small companies use the one page, like the page of  minor universes.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 02:51, 8 February 2019 (EST)
Seems this got tossed by the wayside. I completely agree that we could do with a "List of companies significant to Super Smash Bros", like the developers list. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 12:38, April 6, 2019 (EDT)
:I '''support a merge''' into a global page per above considerations. -[[User:Menshay|Menshay]] ([[User talk:Menshay|talk]]) 06:29, April 25, 2019 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 06:29, April 25, 2019

Deleted[edit]

Should this page be deleted? I noticed other companies without fighters don't have their own pages, like TOSE, Treasure, Eighting, Camelot Software Planning, Vanpool, Noise, Hudson, Koei Tecmo.--Capstalker (talk) 02:44, 29 January 2019 (EST)

I’d argue that we should keep this page and create pages for those other companies to be honest. 47.176.58.194 12:19, 29 January 2019 (EST)
I agree with you.Super Eli (talk) 10:39, 5 February 2019 (EST)
If you’re looking to generate discussion, tag the page with a template:delete so it shows up in categories. – Emmett 03:47, 29 January 2019 (EST)
Don't forget Headstrong Games for Art Academy. Anyway, yeah, I feel that it's unfair that only Yacht Club Games gets to have their own page, but the other "Assist Trophy-only" companies don't. Either we make pages for the others, or we just delete this whole page. SuperSmashTurtles (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2019 (EST)
So we should probably just make pages for the others instead of deleting this one. The assist trophies’ companies is fairly important. 184.181.102.188 17:38, 29 January 2019 (EST)
I don't understand the copyright relationship between these companies and games, it seems that most of them are exclusively publish by Nintendo. Should we create also the developer's page or only the copyright's?--Capstalker (talk) 00:17, 30 January 2019 (EST)

How about we make a page dedicated to these small companies? Either way this should be deleted. Jiashen C. (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2019 (EST)

I think this is the best thing to do. Giving each company their own page presents the same problem as the developer page issue a while ago. Every page would just be "This company developed or published x which is featured in y as an assist trophy." Pokebub (talk) 00:17, 8 February 2019 (EST)
I agree that all small companies use the one page, like the page of minor universes.--Capstalker (talk) 02:51, 8 February 2019 (EST)

Seems this got tossed by the wayside. I completely agree that we could do with a "List of companies significant to Super Smash Bros", like the developers list. - EndGenuity (talk) 12:38, April 6, 2019 (EDT)

I support a merge into a global page per above considerations. -Menshay (talk) 06:29, April 25, 2019 (EDT)