Talk:Pokémon (universe): Difference between revisions
(→"Expected": new section) |
Dr. Pain 99 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Until we have any concrete, confirmed examples, it's blatant speculation to claim that Gen V and VI Pokemon will appear. That's like saying Yoshi is expected to appear based on the fact that he has in all three prior games. Is it likely? Probably. But is it confirmed enough that we should be saying so in the mainspace? Not yet. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 12:42, 7 August 2013 (EDT) | Until we have any concrete, confirmed examples, it's blatant speculation to claim that Gen V and VI Pokemon will appear. That's like saying Yoshi is expected to appear based on the fact that he has in all three prior games. Is it likely? Probably. But is it confirmed enough that we should be saying so in the mainspace? Not yet. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 12:42, 7 August 2013 (EDT) | ||
:It isn't really speculatory when something is, in essence, guaranteed to happen. It would be speculation to say that Gen V/VI Pokémon will have a playable appearance (which makes it a different scenario than your example with Yoshi) or that they will be Pokéball Pokémon, just that they will appear in some form, which nobody would really claim they won't. That brings me to my next point: the article isn't stating that "Gen V/VI Pokémon will appear" or that they're "likely to appear". It says they are ''expected'' to appear, which is a fact, because practically every person who plays Smash is "expecting" them to appear, and in that way, it isn't really speculatory, but reporting on what the community expects will happen. <span style="font-family:Triforce, sans-serif;">'''[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color=#008000>D<font color=#008019>o<font color=#008031>c<font color=#008049>t<font color=#008062>o<font color=#008080>rP</font>a</font>i</font>n</font>9</font>9</font>]]'''</span> 12:55, 7 August 2013 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:55, August 7, 2013
Maybe we should start talking on this talk page, since the Pokemon Universe is a very large topic and so.. yeah. - BigJohnno
- Well, one thing I'd like to point out: I don't think it's a great idea for each of the Smash game sections to have one list of Pokemon subsection for several reasons, one being that the full List of Pokemon is supposed to be the big comprehensive supplement to this page that makes smaller lists like these not necessary. Erik, Lord of Universes 00:15, December 30, 2007 (EST)
Chimchar was seen as a trophy in a Japanese training video, a possible Poke Ball Pokemon or just a trophy?
I think in the next few days Sakurai may or probably will, put something on about the commercial leak characters. BigJohnno
General discuss in the FORUM! ~Crystal_Lucario 07:04, January 25, 2008 (EST)
Where did you get that picture of Lucario from, can you get it with the whole body please and put it on his smash page until its on the dojo. sorry can't sign off gtg.
Eevee and Darkrai and Cherrim confirmation.
Confirmation for above Pokemon.
Gulpin confirmed
Jirachi
I was on youtube and I found this video about Classic mode. After you complete it, there are the credits. As it goes on it shows who did the voices of the Pokémon. Then when looking at the faces of the Pokémon you can see Jirachi's face.See here for yourself.
== Trophies, etc. ==
The trophy sections on here need to be tidied up a bit, I suggest putting them in a table rather then a long list of links.--MysteryHeff (talk · contributions) 06:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Trophies, etc.
The trophy sections on here need to be tidied up a bit, I suggest putting them in a table rather then a long list of links (This message is mainly asking for permission to do that).--MysteryHeff (talk · contributions) 06:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
"Expected"
Until we have any concrete, confirmed examples, it's blatant speculation to claim that Gen V and VI Pokemon will appear. That's like saying Yoshi is expected to appear based on the fact that he has in all three prior games. Is it likely? Probably. But is it confirmed enough that we should be saying so in the mainspace? Not yet. Miles (talk) 12:42, 7 August 2013 (EDT)
- It isn't really speculatory when something is, in essence, guaranteed to happen. It would be speculation to say that Gen V/VI Pokémon will have a playable appearance (which makes it a different scenario than your example with Yoshi) or that they will be Pokéball Pokémon, just that they will appear in some form, which nobody would really claim they won't. That brings me to my next point: the article isn't stating that "Gen V/VI Pokémon will appear" or that they're "likely to appear". It says they are expected to appear, which is a fact, because practically every person who plays Smash is "expecting" them to appear, and in that way, it isn't really speculatory, but reporting on what the community expects will happen. DoctorPain99 12:55, 7 August 2013 (EDT)
