Talk:Navi: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tag: Mobile edit |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Slime's page would also be deleted, if we were to delete this one. As for Morgana, he was given a page the same day as the 15-minute video that showed A. he was a Final Smash character (which was grounds for a page creation anyway), B. he was a taunt character, and C. he was a Mii costume (which was ''also'' grounds for a page creation). [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 14:35, June 30, 2019 (EDT) | ::Slime's page would also be deleted, if we were to delete this one. As for Morgana, he was given a page the same day as the 15-minute video that showed A. he was a Final Smash character (which was grounds for a page creation anyway), B. he was a taunt character, and C. he was a Mii costume (which was ''also'' grounds for a page creation). [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 14:35, June 30, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::Navi and Slime ''should'' keep their pages as they are part of taunts, which is part of a playable character’s abilities. Namco Roulette Characters are like the Mario Maker costumes which were stated by this wiki not to count for a character’s cameo or inclusion on the wiki. Why ''shouldn’t'' taunt characters be given pages? It’s technically part of a character’s arsenal, with cases like Luigi. [[Special:Contributions/172.58.173.88|172.58.173.88]] 16:13, June 30, 2019 (EDT) | :::Navi and Slime ''should'' keep their pages as they are part of taunts, which is part of a playable character’s abilities. Namco Roulette Characters are like the Mario Maker costumes which were stated by this wiki not to count for a character’s cameo or inclusion on the wiki. Why ''shouldn’t'' taunt characters be given pages? It’s technically part of a character’s arsenal, with cases like Luigi. [[Special:Contributions/172.58.173.88|172.58.173.88]] 16:13, June 30, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::The Namco Roulette characters are no different from Navi or Slime, minus the fact that they’re sprites instead of models. None of them have any effect on gameplay at all. I change my oppose to a support now. | |||
::::As for Slime, let’s just wait until the Hero releases, and then we’ll find out if Slime deserves to be deleted as well. If The Hero throws a slime out as part of his moveset, let’s keep it. But for now, let’s just delete Navi’s page. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 18:09, June 30, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:09, June 30, 2019
Deletion
Oppose. Slime also has a page, and is a taunt character as well. If we delete this page, we should delete slime’s as well. Lou Cena (talk) 13:28, June 30, 2019 (EDT)
- Oppose. Navi has appeared in more then one installment as a taunt. And all the ones as part of Namco Roulette do have their own page with Namco Roulette. Navi herself physically appears in a taunt while the Roulette characters aren’t actually there. Especially considering the Mario Maker costumes don’t count when they’re basically the same thing. Morgana was given a page before he was revealed to also be a costume. And with Slime, Navi should keep her page. With Namco Roulette being an entirely different case, what’s preventing Slime and Navi from having pages as taunt elements? Taunts are “technically” a part of their moves, right? Luigi can deal damage with one of his. 172.58.173.88 14:12, June 30, 2019 (EDT)
- Slime's page would also be deleted, if we were to delete this one. As for Morgana, he was given a page the same day as the 15-minute video that showed A. he was a Final Smash character (which was grounds for a page creation anyway), B. he was a taunt character, and C. he was a Mii costume (which was also grounds for a page creation). Aidan, the Rurouni 14:35, June 30, 2019 (EDT)
- Navi and Slime should keep their pages as they are part of taunts, which is part of a playable character’s abilities. Namco Roulette Characters are like the Mario Maker costumes which were stated by this wiki not to count for a character’s cameo or inclusion on the wiki. Why shouldn’t taunt characters be given pages? It’s technically part of a character’s arsenal, with cases like Luigi. 172.58.173.88 16:13, June 30, 2019 (EDT)
- The Namco Roulette characters are no different from Navi or Slime, minus the fact that they’re sprites instead of models. None of them have any effect on gameplay at all. I change my oppose to a support now.
- As for Slime, let’s just wait until the Hero releases, and then we’ll find out if Slime deserves to be deleted as well. If The Hero throws a slime out as part of his moveset, let’s keep it. But for now, let’s just delete Navi’s page. Lou Cena (talk) 18:09, June 30, 2019 (EDT)
- Navi and Slime should keep their pages as they are part of taunts, which is part of a playable character’s abilities. Namco Roulette Characters are like the Mario Maker costumes which were stated by this wiki not to count for a character’s cameo or inclusion on the wiki. Why shouldn’t taunt characters be given pages? It’s technically part of a character’s arsenal, with cases like Luigi. 172.58.173.88 16:13, June 30, 2019 (EDT)
- Slime's page would also be deleted, if we were to delete this one. As for Morgana, he was given a page the same day as the 15-minute video that showed A. he was a Final Smash character (which was grounds for a page creation anyway), B. he was a taunt character, and C. he was a Mii costume (which was also grounds for a page creation). Aidan, the Rurouni 14:35, June 30, 2019 (EDT)
