Talk:Mario (SSBB)/Neutral attack/Hit 1

Archives
1

Merge

You wrote up separate descriptions about Ike's neutral attack in favor of keeping the pages separate. I told you that even if you wanted them to be separate, they could still be on the same page, underneath each other in different paragraphs. How is that steering away from the original conversation? Awesome Cardinal 2000 19:59, 28 September 2013 (EDT)

After that, but whatever. Scr7(talk · contribs) 03:07, 29 September 2013 (EDT)

Anyone else? Scr7(talk · contribs) 03:14, 29 September 2013 (EDT)

Personally I just want this discussion done. Come to an agreement, guys. I'm in favor of keeping them as is, but as we know I'm not one for longevity of discussions. RoyboyX Talk 10:00, 30 September 2013 (EDT)

It's obvious more people need to get involved in this discussion. At this rate, no one's saying anything, and me and Ac2k could argue forever with no result. So, I'm starting the support/oppose/comments thing.

Support

1. Per everything I've said in the discussion. Awesome Cardinal 2000 11:41, 5 October 2013 (EDT)
2. Still no reason to split it up like it is. Miles (talk) 12:34, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

Oppose

1. Per everything I've said in the discussion. Scr7(talk · contribs) 11:37, 5 October 2013 (EDT)
2. Per Scr7. RoyboyX Talk 11:47, 5 October 2013 (EDT)
3. It would be a lot simpler and cleaner if we just had separate data for each of the subpages. Dots The Smiley 12:50, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

Comments

@Dots: The tables don't look much harder to follow when merged, and putting them on separate pages just splits the information up making it harder to follow and read about as a whole. Awesome Cardinal 2000 13:11, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

So what your saying is that it is easier to just look at all the info on that one page so we don't have to move to page to page to look at all the info? Then your going to have to make subsections for each data. Dots The Mewtwo 13:26, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

The tables are put directly together when merged, they are most definitely more difficult to follow than separate tables. Scr7(talk · contribs) 13:28, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

Although they may be more difficult to follow, does that mean they are actually hard? Awesome Cardinal 2000 15:20, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

If neither are hard to follow and the merged ones are more difficult to follow (which is what you said), split ones are better. Scr7(talk · contribs) 15:24, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

What about the benefits that come from merging them then? Awesome Cardinal 2000 15:54, 5 October 2013 (EDT)

What fucking "benefits that come from merging them"? Scr7(talk · contribs) 15:56, 5 October 2013 (EDT)