Talk:John

All of these johns are from this thread. Anyway, I think it would be better if we just had an explanation of what johns are and not an entire list. We don't really need dozens of examples, only a few. --YodaMasterZ 21:11, December 29, 2007 (EST)

Mild Delete: Is this page even necessary in the first place? --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 20:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

It is absolutely necessary. But it needs some serious clarification and expansion and should probably be moved to johns, as it is rarely used singularly. Maybe even to "no johns", or at least a mention of the phrase and its widespread use throughout competitive smash. --RJM ^Talk 03:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with RJM the content of john is completely necessary. Maybe a name change or a merge, but not a deletion. No johns is how this phrase is most frequently used. Ryzol (talk) 07:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm also leaining towards delete or a merge to some kind of article with smashing phrases. Kperfekt722 (talk) 23:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)