Talk:Ganon Punch: Difference between revisions
MarioGalaxy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Why don't we just put it as trivia in the [[Warlock Punch]] article? [[User:MarioGalaxy|MarioGalaxy]] ([[User talk:MarioGalaxy|talk]]) 21:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | Why don't we just put it as trivia in the [[Warlock Punch]] article? [[User:MarioGalaxy|MarioGalaxy]] ([[User talk:MarioGalaxy|talk]]) 21:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Oh! I'll make another poll! | |||
Nah, just kidding. Go on ahead. [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 22:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:17, August 19, 2008
Oh, yeah. I like yelling out, "Warlock....Paaawnch!!" when I use this move as Ganondorf. Cafinator (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
All right! I'm not alone. SCHWEETNESS! Smorekingxg456 (talk) 20:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
This doesn't deserve an article. (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 20:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC))
Well, I think it should stay. Cafinator (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, I guess it's the perfect time to try something I've always wanted to do. Here we go!
<poll> Keep or Delete? Keep Delete </poll>
Now that I thought it over, though. This may be a little more important for something like a poll. Oh well. Cafinator (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Too late ShadowCrest Redirected it.Smorekingxg456 (talk) 20:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- You can edit it still. But you'll have a hard time convincing me this would make a worthy article. Unless it's a redirect its function is minimal, and would probably be deleted. --Shadowcrest 20:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, people say keep it. But, I guess a redirect would be acceptable. Cafinator (talk) 21:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Why don't we just put it as trivia in the Warlock Punch article? MarioGalaxy (talk) 21:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Oh! I'll make another poll!
Nah, just kidding. Go on ahead. Cafinator (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)