Talk:Frizz / Frizzle / Kafrizz: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Move: new section) |
Aidanzapunk (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I '''oppose''' moving this article to "Frizz / Frizzle / Kafrizz" because in Smash, even though these three moves have some differences, they're all just different levels of charge for the same side special. Plus, I've met plenty of Hero players who look at Hero's specials the same way I do: as Frizz, Whoosh, and Zap "families" of moves. They all have the same term in their name, and have similar effects between each of them. I don't often see people specifically mention "Frizzle" or "Kafrizz", they often just say "fully charged Frizz" or something of the like. Did I mention how absolutely bloated of a name "Frizz / Frizzle / Kafrizz" would be? Do I even have to? [[User:Acgamer28|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:blue">'''Acgamer'''</span>]][[User talk:Acgamer28|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:red">'''28'''</span>]][[File:Acgamer28SignatureHead.png|20px]] 17:28, June 25, 2020 (EDT) | I '''oppose''' moving this article to "Frizz / Frizzle / Kafrizz" because in Smash, even though these three moves have some differences, they're all just different levels of charge for the same side special. Plus, I've met plenty of Hero players who look at Hero's specials the same way I do: as Frizz, Whoosh, and Zap "families" of moves. They all have the same term in their name, and have similar effects between each of them. I don't often see people specifically mention "Frizzle" or "Kafrizz", they often just say "fully charged Frizz" or something of the like. Did I mention how absolutely bloated of a name "Frizz / Frizzle / Kafrizz" would be? Do I even have to? [[User:Acgamer28|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:blue">'''Acgamer'''</span>]][[User talk:Acgamer28|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:red">'''28'''</span>]][[File:Acgamer28SignatureHead.png|20px]] 17:28, June 25, 2020 (EDT) | ||
:I stated my opinions through Discord, but there is at least distinction to be argued for in favor of moving, as Frizz, Frizzle, and Kafrizz each have their own identity both here and in the ''Dragon Quest'' series. The same can't be said for the {{b|Thunder|Robin}} spells from ''Fire Emblem'', as both in ''Smash'' and ''Awakening'' (and, I believe, other ''Fire Emblem'' titles), they aren't separated by Thunder, Elthunder, Arcthunder, and Thoron, but are all instead classified under the Thunder tome. Magic spells in ''Dragon Quest'' (and other franchises that take inspiration from ''Dragon Quest'', like ''Final Fantasy'' and ''Kingdom Hearts'') '''are''' separated by name, however. | |||
:And even then, each differing level has different properties, attributes, and animations—not just for Frizz, but Zap and Whoosh as well—that make it clear that each level is its own thing, rather than your average Charge Shot that just increases in size and power. Even the aforementioned Thunder spells fit under the latter, aside from a small animation after Thoron. | |||
:The whole point of me suggesting we showcase all moves equally (outside of moves that are just the same, but slightly different) was because there are moves that are completely different entities from the other moves that are associated with the input. Are Frizz, Frizzle, and Kafrizz 100% completely different? No. But are they all the same? I say no to that too. The same applies to Zap, Zapple, and Kazap, and Woosh, Swoosh, and Kaswoosh. I '''support''' moving. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 17:50, June 25, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:50, June 25, 2020
Move
I oppose moving this article to "Frizz / Frizzle / Kafrizz" because in Smash, even though these three moves have some differences, they're all just different levels of charge for the same side special. Plus, I've met plenty of Hero players who look at Hero's specials the same way I do: as Frizz, Whoosh, and Zap "families" of moves. They all have the same term in their name, and have similar effects between each of them. I don't often see people specifically mention "Frizzle" or "Kafrizz", they often just say "fully charged Frizz" or something of the like. Did I mention how absolutely bloated of a name "Frizz / Frizzle / Kafrizz" would be? Do I even have to? Acgamer28
17:28, June 25, 2020 (EDT)
- I stated my opinions through Discord, but there is at least distinction to be argued for in favor of moving, as Frizz, Frizzle, and Kafrizz each have their own identity both here and in the Dragon Quest series. The same can't be said for the Thunder spells from Fire Emblem, as both in Smash and Awakening (and, I believe, other Fire Emblem titles), they aren't separated by Thunder, Elthunder, Arcthunder, and Thoron, but are all instead classified under the Thunder tome. Magic spells in Dragon Quest (and other franchises that take inspiration from Dragon Quest, like Final Fantasy and Kingdom Hearts) are separated by name, however.
- And even then, each differing level has different properties, attributes, and animations—not just for Frizz, but Zap and Whoosh as well—that make it clear that each level is its own thing, rather than your average Charge Shot that just increases in size and power. Even the aforementioned Thunder spells fit under the latter, aside from a small animation after Thoron.
- The whole point of me suggesting we showcase all moves equally (outside of moves that are just the same, but slightly different) was because there are moves that are completely different entities from the other moves that are associated with the input. Are Frizz, Frizzle, and Kafrizz 100% completely different? No. But are they all the same? I say no to that too. The same applies to Zap, Zapple, and Kazap, and Woosh, Swoosh, and Kaswoosh. I support moving. Aidan, the Rurouni 17:50, June 25, 2020 (EDT)
