Talk:Approaching attack

Space Animal's Side B

Uh Space Animal's side b goes only a LITTLE less of a distance than Meta Knight's drill rush. So it should be listed.--Oxico (talk) 23:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

REJECT THE ABOVE STATEMENT. My bad I thought it said side special not side smash. :P But I think the peach bomber is too short a distance too.--Oxico (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

But I thought that the length increased from melee to brawl. And wouldn't Ganon's and CF's Down B be an approach attack? Zexas A. (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Peach has increased in lenghth, so is similar to Wolf's side B, and so stays, ans u are correct about the down B kicks. I dont think this should be merged with Approach as that page contains links to all other types of approach, and these attacks are a type of appraoch, and so the list of them should be here, and the link to it in Approach. Phayz (talk) 00:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)(User talk:Phayz) 01:21 July 31

Don't merge it. The same reasons Phayz had. I also just put a link on the bottom of the pageSmorekingxg456 (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Merge it. Smorekingxg456 (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Obvious Merge

Really? How can you have "long range attacks that move your character a.k.a. Approach Attacks" listed as a "type of approach" on the Approach article and not see how these articles should be merged? Oi.

This is what should happen:

• The content should be loosely merged into Approach
• "Types of Approaches" needs a cleanup, but it should stay basically the same.
• "Common Approach Attacks" should be listed as a second level 2 header with the information from the Approach Attacks article as it relates to specific characters.
• It should really have some disambiguation with regards to what games they apply in, too. After all, you can't SHFFL in Brawl.

Yes? Yes. --RJM ^Talk 17:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I agree. :-| - Amycats2 (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)