Smasher talk:Domo: Difference between revisions
MHStarCraft (talk | contribs) (→Domo (Japan): new section) |
MHStarCraft (talk | contribs) m (→Domo (Japan)) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Domo (Japan) == | == Domo (Japan) == | ||
Why do we need "(Japan)" on this | Why do we need "(Japan)" on this article's title? [[User:Dots|Dots]] [[User talk:Dots|The]] [[Special:Contributions/Dots|Safari]] [[File:NintenNESsprite.png|19px]] 23:02, 22 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:02, September 22, 2012
A lot of this article seems to be completely made up :/
"widely considered Japan's best Ice Climbers player", by who?
"western Climber enthusiasts agree that no other player out of Japan has shown a comparable level of aptitude", when did western Climbers players agree this?
"his polished technique shows a marked difference in what a competitive player can do in Japan as opposed to that of the Western community", Erm... Western ICs players DO de-synch as much as Domo...
"Certain elements of Domo's desynchronization mastery, such as the advancing short hop desynched ice blocks, would ultimately contribute to a deeper exploration of the potential continous desync in the 2006 Canadian tutorial video, Two Climbers, Two Hands." Proof? I don't see any evidence that TC, TH was inspired by Domo. 124.171.82.15 03:22, 9 January 2011 (EST)
- This article is quite old and it been about three years since the actual content of the article was edited. However, the person who added the information was a smasher specialist, and along with considering how long this article been around, I'm going to trust it. So, if the information is to be removed, you'll have to present evidence to the contrary. Though, I do believe it's safe to remove or adjust the third statement you brought up. Omega Tyrant
08:09, 9 January 2011 (EST)
Domo (Japan)
Why do we need "(Japan)" on this article's title? Dots The Safari 
23:02, 22 September 2012 (EDT)
