SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/ClonedPickle: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision: pages) |
m (Text replacement - ":Accepted Rollback" to ":Accepted rollback requests") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''Result''': Granted rollback. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 04:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)'' | '''''Result''': Granted rollback. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 04:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)'' | ||
===[[User:ClonedPickle|ClonedPickle]]=== | ===[[User:ClonedPickle|ClonedPickle]]=== | ||
Hi everyone. I am ClonedPickle, and as this suggests, I am requesting for rollback. Although I did not start to become active until around December 2008, I have lately been not only been editing the pages more often but also have reverted quite a bit of edits that are either geared toward vandalism or irrelevant information, and rollback would certainly increase the number of reverts I have already. Believe me in this, I am not requesting for rollback to seem powerful, as I know that rollback is simply just adding another button for editing tools. Also, I would never vandalize any page whatsoever, I have not gotten in to trouble or violated any policies of the wiki, and I check the Recent Changes Box often because I'm on this wiki far more than I used to be. Also, I definitely would not lose my cool if there happened to be disagreements/insults, because I do know how to deal with stuff like that now (not like how I was three to four years ago). I was told I should consider running for rollback, so I decided to go for it. Feel free to leave your support or opposition below. | Hi everyone. I am ClonedPickle, and as this suggests, I am requesting for rollback. Although I did not start to become active until around December 2008, I have lately been not only been editing the pages more often but also have reverted quite a bit of edits that are either geared toward vandalism or irrelevant information, and rollback would certainly increase the number of reverts I have already. Believe me in this, I am not requesting for rollback to seem powerful, as I know that rollback is simply just adding another button for editing tools. Also, I would never vandalize any page whatsoever, I have not gotten in to trouble or violated any policies of the wiki, and I check the Recent Changes Box often because I'm on this wiki far more than I used to be. Also, I definitely would not lose my cool if there happened to be disagreements/insults, because I do know how to deal with stuff like that now (not like how I was three to four years ago). I was told I should consider running for rollback, so I decided to go for it. Feel free to leave your support or opposition below. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Slight Support''' Miles. [[User:Masterman|<span style="color: fuchsia">Masterman</span>]] [[User talk:Masterman|<span style="color= blue">20</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Masterman|<span style="color: gold">09</span>]] 03:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | *'''Slight Support''' Miles. [[User:Masterman|<span style="color: fuchsia">Masterman</span>]] [[User talk:Masterman|<span style="color= blue">20</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Masterman|<span style="color: gold">09</span>]] 03:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
[[Category:Accepted | [[Category:Accepted rollback requests]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:33, April 13, 2022
Result: Granted rollback. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
ClonedPickle[edit]
Hi everyone. I am ClonedPickle, and as this suggests, I am requesting for rollback. Although I did not start to become active until around December 2008, I have lately been not only been editing the pages more often but also have reverted quite a bit of edits that are either geared toward vandalism or irrelevant information, and rollback would certainly increase the number of reverts I have already. Believe me in this, I am not requesting for rollback to seem powerful, as I know that rollback is simply just adding another button for editing tools. Also, I would never vandalize any page whatsoever, I have not gotten in to trouble or violated any policies of the wiki, and I check the Recent Changes Box often because I'm on this wiki far more than I used to be. Also, I definitely would not lose my cool if there happened to be disagreements/insults, because I do know how to deal with stuff like that now (not like how I was three to four years ago). I was told I should consider running for rollback, so I decided to go for it. Feel free to leave your support or opposition below.
Thanks for reading. ClonedPickle 08:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Votes/Comments[edit]
- Strong Support I'm glad you took my advice. You have 25 reverts, and your active, responsible and reliable. Well done. GutripperSpeak
- Support It will be well deserved. Good work, Pickle. Toon Ganondorf (t c)
- Supports don't get much bigger - Gutripper. Plus, user has no record of violations and has made plenty of reverts. Blue Ninjakoopa 11:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Über support What everybody else said.Smoreking(T) (c) 13:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Slight support. Some reversions, a good faith editor. Miles (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support. This user seems particularly competent in addition to having a (comparatively) high number of reverts in addition to an even manner and no policy violations or other things like that. A good candidate ^^ Alice 21:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Miles and Alice. Friedbeef1Screech 22:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support ClonedPickle seems to be a user who can be trusted with rollback, mainly because ClonedPickle has numerous reverts. Y462 (T • C • E ) 23:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Slight Support Miles. Masterman 2009 03:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
