Interruptibility: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Mobile edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{articleIcons|allgames=y}} | {{articleIcons|allgames=y}} | ||
{{video|comparison of non-interruptible dtilt to this one}} | |||
[[File:MK D-tilt IASA.gif|thumb|{{SSBB|Meta Knight}} interrupts his [[down tilt]] by [[shield]]ing.]] | [[File:MK D-tilt IASA.gif|thumb|{{SSBB|Meta Knight}} interrupts his [[down tilt]] by [[shield]]ing.]] | ||
'''Interruptibility''' is the ability to begin a new action even though the current action's animation has not yet finished. For example, while {{SSBB|Mario}}'s [[forward smash]] in ''[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]'' takes 56 [[frame]]s to complete execution, the player can interrupt the ending frames and do something else as early as frame 48. For most intents and purposes, this results in the last part of the animation simply being filler, as the player is likely to attack, jump, or simply move as soon as possible. Many attacks have a minor amount of interruptible frames during their [[ending lag]], while in general [[special move]]s and get-up animations do not; some attacks such as [[Marth]]'s or [[Ness]]'s [[down tilt]]s have a significant interruptibility window which allows them to follow up the attack much faster than the animation would suggest. | '''Interruptibility''' is the ability to begin a new action even though the current action's animation has not yet finished. For example, while {{SSBB|Mario}}'s [[forward smash]] in ''[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]'' takes 56 [[frame]]s to complete execution, the player can interrupt the ending frames and do something else as early as frame 48. For most intents and purposes, this results in the last part of the animation simply being filler, as the player is likely to attack, jump, or simply move as soon as possible. Many attacks have a minor amount of interruptible frames during their [[ending lag]], while in general [[special move]]s and get-up animations do not; some attacks such as [[Marth]]'s or [[Ness]]'s [[down tilt]]s have a significant interruptibility window which allows them to follow up the attack much faster than the animation would suggest. | ||
Revision as of 23:57, October 24, 2014
|
This article could use additional or higher-quality animated images or videos. The editor who added this tag suggests: comparison of non-interruptible dtilt to this one If you have a good animated image for this article, upload it here. If you have a good video for this article, link to it or embed it with the {{#widget:YouTube|id=}} tag. |
Interruptibility is the ability to begin a new action even though the current action's animation has not yet finished. For example, while Mario's forward smash in Super Smash Bros. Brawl takes 56 frames to complete execution, the player can interrupt the ending frames and do something else as early as frame 48. For most intents and purposes, this results in the last part of the animation simply being filler, as the player is likely to attack, jump, or simply move as soon as possible. Many attacks have a minor amount of interruptible frames during their ending lag, while in general special moves and get-up animations do not; some attacks such as Marth's or Ness's down tilts have a significant interruptibility window which allows them to follow up the attack much faster than the animation would suggest.
In Super Smash Bros., interruptibility is not very common, only being used at the ends of some taunts and non-final neutral attacks. Super Smash Bros. Melee expanded interruptibility's applications to many attacks, and Brawl continued the idea as a common mechanic.
It is possible for actions to be interruptible with only certain kinds of actions, such as the case with jump cancelling.
In Smash 64 and Melee, interrupting a delayed double jump results in double jump cancelling. Brawl disables this by only interrupting the animation of the double jump, not the execution.
Trivia
- An older name for the concept of interruptibility is "interruptible as soon as frames", or "IASA frames", under the premise of describing them with "the attack can be interrupted as soon as frame X". As technical research into Brawl progressed, the term began falling out of favour due to its wordiness and the implication that it is a property of the frames, when in fact it is a property of the move as a whole.
