Forum:A new usergroup idea: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{proposal}}
For about a year or two, I've been thinking that we have a good amount of pages around here that fit these two properties:
For about a year or two, I've been thinking that we have a good amount of pages around here that fit these two properties:
# They're important enough that it would be prudent to protect them so not just anyone can edit them.
# They're important enough that it would be prudent to protect them so not just anyone can edit them.

Revision as of 14:06, February 11, 2019

Proposed.png This discussion is in regards to a proposed change on SmashWiki. The discussion must first meet with a consensus before it is implemented.

For about a year or two, I've been thinking that we have a good amount of pages around here that fit these two properties:

  1. They're important enough that it would be prudent to protect them so not just anyone can edit them.
  2. They're detailed enough that it would be useful for them to be editable by users who are not admins.

An example would be a widely-used infobox or complex template. We don't really want inexperienced users to have a good idea but screw up the execution because they don't understand the wiki code yet, but we also don't really want to limit all possible useful additions to be restricted to the limited staff members. Autoconfirmed-protection doesn't really solve the problem because it only requires 7 days and 10 edits - that's not really enough time to get acquainted with the wiki or prove that you know how to edit well, only to prove that you're likely a good faith user.

I've recently discovered that it's actually possible to add a new level of protection to the wiki, outside the current two of "autoconfirmed-only" and "admin-only". So I've had the idea of creating a new usergroup to leverage this.

Here is the proposal: After 90 days and 100 edits, users gain the "established" permission. (This is about 10-12 times autoconfirmed.) The purpose of this is to provide a more accurate measure of where a user stands. The gist is:

  1. An IP or new user cannot necessarily be trusted, and has not proven anything. They can edit unprotected pages.
  2. An autoconfirmed user (7 days + 10 edits) has proven good faith. They can edit pages protected against vandalism.
  3. An established user (90 days + 100 edits) has proven editing experience and is likely to have also proven community trustworthiness. They can edit pages restricted to those who are expected to know what they are doing.

This page is so any major objections can be put down. Toomai Glittershine ??? The Boss 17:50, 10 February 2019 (EST)

This seems like a good idea. There needs to be some sort of intermediary protection, and 90+100 is long enough for experience. Bwburke94 (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2019 (EST)