SmashWiki talk:Policy: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→New policy) |
Serpent King (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Wikipedia has a similar policy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autopatrolled [[File:AlbumArt-Dixie.png|20px]] [[User:TabuuandMasterCore|TabuuandMasterCore]] 11:42, 28 June 2016 (EDT) | ::Wikipedia has a similar policy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autopatrolled [[File:AlbumArt-Dixie.png|20px]] [[User:TabuuandMasterCore|TabuuandMasterCore]] 11:42, 28 June 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::I don't really think Wikipedia policies work here, in this case. We're not Wikipedia, after all. Even then, however, why do we even need them? You never explained that. [[File:PenroImage.png|19px]][[User:Penro|<font color="orange">'''Pen'''</font><font color="gold">'''ro'''</font>]] 11:50, 28 June 2016 (EDT) | ::::I don't really think Wikipedia policies work here, in this case. We're not Wikipedia, after all. Even then, however, why do we even need them? You never explained that. [[File:PenroImage.png|19px]][[User:Penro|<font color="orange">'''Pen'''</font><font color="gold">'''ro'''</font>]] 11:50, 28 June 2016 (EDT) | ||
Here's the deal: | |||
#We have a [[SmashWiki:Policy#Proposing_a_new_policy|system]] for proposing new policies. Use it. | |||
#The "junior administrator" policy has been attempted 3 times, and each time has subsequently failed. The fact is that this wiki's userbase is simply not large enough to justify having a "lower administrator" position. It's something that our community clearly does not want, so I say we leave it alone. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #0b7">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #fd0">King</span>]]'''</span> 12:44, 28 June 2016 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 12:44, June 28, 2016
Can nonadmins propose policies? Mr. Anon teh awsome 03:00, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Admins decide if it passes.--MegaTron1XD 03:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
- (mainly based on user consensus) Shadowcrest 18:04, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
New policy[edit]
I have an idea I think we need patrollers (Not quite rollbackers.) TabuuandMasterCore 09:46, 28 June 2016 (EDT)
- Well, we are all kind of patrollers, aren't we? The idea of "junior admins" has been shot down several times because it was decided that there wouldn't be enough of a difference between regular and "junior" admins. John PK SMAAAASH!! 11:09, 28 June 2016 (EDT)
- Wikipedia has a similar policy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autopatrolled TabuuandMasterCore 11:42, 28 June 2016 (EDT)
- I don't really think Wikipedia policies work here, in this case. We're not Wikipedia, after all. Even then, however, why do we even need them? You never explained that. Penro 11:50, 28 June 2016 (EDT)
- Wikipedia has a similar policy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autopatrolled TabuuandMasterCore 11:42, 28 June 2016 (EDT)
Here's the deal:
- We have a system for proposing new policies. Use it.
- The "junior administrator" policy has been attempted 3 times, and each time has subsequently failed. The fact is that this wiki's userbase is simply not large enough to justify having a "lower administrator" position. It's something that our community clearly does not want, so I say we leave it alone. Serpent King 12:44, 28 June 2016 (EDT)