SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Bek The Conqueror: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "== ([^=])" to "== $1") |
m (Text replacement - ":Accepted Rollback" to ":Accepted rollback requests") |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Comment''' And I have a lot more reverts on Zeldapedia, (21 vandals detected there as compared to 8 here) but I'm getting better at recognizing edits that are likely to be vandalism on the recent changes page here at SW than I was, so expect to see more from me in the future.--'''[[User:Bek The Conqueror|<font color="darkgreen">Bek</font>]]''' [[User talk:Bek The Conqueror|<font color="darkblue">(talk)</font>]] 04:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' And I have a lot more reverts on Zeldapedia, (21 vandals detected there as compared to 8 here) but I'm getting better at recognizing edits that are likely to be vandalism on the recent changes page here at SW than I was, so expect to see more from me in the future.--'''[[User:Bek The Conqueror|<font color="darkgreen">Bek</font>]]''' [[User talk:Bek The Conqueror|<font color="darkblue">(talk)</font>]] 04:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
[[Category:Accepted | [[Category:Accepted rollback requests]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:34, April 13, 2022
Result: Granted Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 06:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
|
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Bek The Conqueror[edit]
Hello, everybody. I am Bek the Conqueror, and I am requesting rollback rights, obviously. I have made somewhere in the ballpark of 1,900 edits, and have helped to ID/ wipe the trail of 8 vandals at last count. I am not counting vandals that I found but were blocked by the admins before I could notify them of the damage. I have mostly been categorizing images as of late, but I have also made many edits regarding links to disambiguation pages, etc. I already patrol the "Recent Changes" page to find any possible vandals, and I generally keep my cool, save for one incident regarding the proposed speedy deletion of my userpage, which I fully admit, I did not handle all that well. However, I have looked over SW's policies since then and I have learned my lesson. I also patrol the "Broken Redirects" and "Double Redirects" logs. I think that I could use rollback well, and I await your decision on the matter.--Bek (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Votes/Comments[edit]
- Moderate support. The image categorization alone shows a high level of dedication to this wiki, and that dedication is much of what's earning this vote. The rest is a history of combatting vandalism on Bek's part. Miles (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support. He's active and does have some reverts to this wiki. ClonedPickle 22:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support he has teh reverts.Smoreking(T) (c) 19:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Although Bek's actual number of reverts is not huge, he's active, dedicated, and he's demonstrated a willingness to combat vandals. I'm confident that he'd put rollback to good use. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment And I have a lot more reverts on Zeldapedia, (21 vandals detected there as compared to 8 here) but I'm getting better at recognizing edits that are likely to be vandalism on the recent changes page here at SW than I was, so expect to see more from me in the future.--Bek (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
