SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Bek The Conqueror

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Result: Granted Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 06:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

The icon for archives. This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Bek The Conqueror[edit]

Hello, everybody. I am Bek the Conqueror, and I am requesting rollback rights, obviously. I have made somewhere in the ballpark of 1,900 edits, and have helped to ID/ wipe the trail of 8 vandals at last count. I am not counting vandals that I found but were blocked by the admins before I could notify them of the damage. I have mostly been categorizing images as of late, but I have also made many edits regarding links to disambiguation pages, etc. I already patrol the "Recent Changes" page to find any possible vandals, and I generally keep my cool, save for one incident regarding the proposed speedy deletion of my userpage, which I fully admit, I did not handle all that well. However, I have looked over SW's policies since then and I have learned my lesson. I also patrol the "Broken Redirects" and "Double Redirects" logs. I think that I could use rollback well, and I await your decision on the matter.--Bek (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


  • Moderate support. The image categorization alone shows a high level of dedication to this wiki, and that dedication is much of what's earning this vote. The rest is a history of combatting vandalism on Bek's part. Miles (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. He's active and does have some reverts to this wiki. ClonedPickle 22:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support he has teh reverts.Smoreking(T) (c) 19:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Although Bek's actual number of reverts is not huge, he's active, dedicated, and he's demonstrated a willingness to combat vandals. I'm confident that he'd put rollback to good use. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment And I have a lot more reverts on Zeldapedia, (21 vandals detected there as compared to 8 here) but I'm getting better at recognizing edits that are likely to be vandalism on the recent changes page here at SW than I was, so expect to see more from me in the future.--Bek (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)