Talk:Classic Mode (SSBU): Difference between revisions

Talk:Classic Mode (SSBU) (edit)

Revision as of 03:53, February 20, 2019

1,789 bytes added , 5 years ago

→‎Sonic’s stock icon in Pikachu’s collumn

DevNode

253

edits

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 I put it there so that the table would not have an empty space. Do I have permission to put it back? [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 00:48, 20 February 2019 (EST)
+:Factual accuracy, I think, would be of greater importance in this matter, and the behavior of character unlocks past what is illustrated in the table is already explained in the text above it.  What's important here is that Sonic is a member of Mario's column, not Pikachu's.  Putting Sonic at the bottom of Pikachu's column introduces a logical inconsistency with the very premise of the section: "Completing Classic Mode with a character unlocks the next available character in their column."
+:If you unlock Pichu or Isabelle before anyone else in Pikachu's column and complete Classic Mode with them, you get prompted to fight Villager, because Villager is the next locked character down from Pikachu on the table.  This is always true as long as Villager is locked.
+:Sonic does not follow the same rules as Pichu and Isabelle.  if you complete Classic Mode with Sonic, you'll almost never be prompted fight to unlock Villager unless you have every character from Bayonetta to Mewtwo already unlocked *and* you haven't played enough Vs. Mode to unlock six characters *and* you passed Villager over at the beginning of World of Light.  Thus, having Sonic at the bottom of Pikachu's column would misrepresent Sonic's behavior in the process of unlocking fighters through Classic Mode, even if he is who would follow if everyone else in Pikachu's column was already unlocked.  Sonic is a member of Mario's column, and Mario's column only.  This distinction should be unambiguous, and his exclusion from the last cell on the table makes it so, even if it stops the table from being completely filled.
+:That's my case, at least.  Hopefully this helps you understand why I've decided to undo your edit. [[User:DevNode|DevNode]] ([[User talk:DevNode|talk]]) 02:52, 20 February 2019 (EST)