Forum:Categorizing Special Moves: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Capstalker (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
:::::I don’t trust ourselves to come up with something practical. Our best bet is to just split them all. That way we can stop these drawn-out arguments on which ones to split and which ones to merge, because they’re all split. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 02:50, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | :::::I don’t trust ourselves to come up with something practical. Our best bet is to just split them all. That way we can stop these drawn-out arguments on which ones to split and which ones to merge, because they’re all split. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 02:50, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::But we need a better basis to split them all than just stopping "''these drawn-out arguments''", that is is only a part of basis and why we are having this entire topic to categorize the special moves in the first place. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 03:03, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::But we need a better basis to split them all than just stopping "''these drawn-out arguments''", that is is only a part of basis and why we are having this entire topic to categorize the special moves in the first place. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 03:03, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::::Simply put, there seem to be four main points in the debate: name, origin, functionality and animation. Maybe we can look at them separately, when half of them are different, they are split.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 03:28, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | |||
{{Proposal}} | {{Proposal}} |