Talk:Ike (SSBU): Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
:::Addendum: "I talked with some Ikecord members and absolutely nobody thought rango should be on the notable players list, and I agree with the assessment" is not a credible reason to remove my entry. As such, the reasoning for removing me holds zero credibility and cannot be substantiated. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Rango|Rango]] ([[User talk:Rango|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rango|contribs]]) 22:31, May 23, 2021 (EDT)</small>
:::Addendum: "I talked with some Ikecord members and absolutely nobody thought rango should be on the notable players list, and I agree with the assessment" is not a credible reason to remove my entry. As such, the reasoning for removing me holds zero credibility and cannot be substantiated. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Rango|Rango]] ([[User talk:Rango|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rango|contribs]]) 22:31, May 23, 2021 (EDT)</small>
::::You need to stop edit warring. While you were once not disputed to be notable, it is now being disputed. Perhaps you are right, you do deserve to be on the Ike list, however, '''[[SW:OWN#Smasher articles|you alone don't get to decide that]]'''. Now that a dispute has been raised, you cannot say you still belong there until we have discussed the matter, and you have waited an appropriate amount of time for people to refute or confirm it. It doesn't matter how much you think you deserve to be there still, '''you don't get to decide that'''. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|🦊'''Furry Nation'''🐺]]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 22:39, May 23, 2021 (EDT)
::::You need to stop edit warring. While you were once not disputed to be notable, it is now being disputed. Perhaps you are right, you do deserve to be on the Ike list, however, '''[[SW:OWN#Smasher articles|you alone don't get to decide that]]'''. Now that a dispute has been raised, you cannot say you still belong there until we have discussed the matter, and you have waited an appropriate amount of time for people to refute or confirm it. It doesn't matter how much you think you deserve to be there still, '''you don't get to decide that'''. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|🦊'''Furry Nation'''🐺]]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 22:39, May 23, 2021 (EDT)
:::::Okay and who are "people" exactly? I want to know who's deciding that my results are considered notable.

Revision as of 22:47, May 23, 2021

Rango on the Ike results page.

moved from User talk:CanvasK#Rango on the Ike results page.

Hello. This is regarding MemeDedede removing my entry on the Ike notable results page. I just wanted to let you know a few things.

1) He consulted with the Ike Discord rather than: Georgia TOs and PR players, people who keep track of tournament results, and other less-biased sources. He contacted a Discord of players who have a strong distaste for me. Naturally, this was a biased attempt to smear my results.

2) Unfortunately, anyone who isn't Ravenking or Yez in that Discord isn't even listed on the Ike notable players. That's because they choose to bring me up regularly instead of practicing the game and earning results.

Summary: MemeDedede's analysis (especially where he says "and I agree") isn't credible information. He used a group of biased players from a Discord where a tiny handful of the pioneers of the Ike meta rarely, if ever, visit. I'm 100% confident in my results locally, regionally, and even in majors like CEO. My own results speak for themselves and I would appreciate less-biased wiki users editing the Ike page in the future.

I cannot participate in offline tournaments until the pandemic ends and I'm able to travel. Furthermore, as with many offline players, I do not participate in online tournaments which should not negatively affect one's results as a player. I hope you will take this into consideration so this doesn't get out of hand.

Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rango (talkcontribs) 21:59, May 23, 2021 (EDT)

As I've stated on your talk page (you should have replied over there by the way), there is a conflict of interest present in your actions. As such, you should not be adding such a mention yourself without first discussing the matter extensively on a talk page and have a consensus be reached in your favour. You will not be granted special treatment just because you yourself are the article subject - everybody on this wiki is subject to the exact same rules as everyone else. Black Vulpine of the 🦊Furry Nation🐺. Furries make the internets go! :3 22:07, May 23, 2021 (EDT)
Well, considering I've consistently taken Top 8 in my state results, been PR #9, and only went to Honorable Mentions solely because I live 2 hrs away and can only travel to Atlanta once a month, I'm still a notable Ike player. I'm also the best Ike main in Georgia.
Placing Top 8 at GA monthlies isn't paltry. But I don't think you seem to get it. I'm one of the region's best players with the character bar-none. My name has remained on the page for years until someone took cues from a biased Discord of players who dislike me, not regarding my results. It wasn't a problem till then and my results speak for themselves. So I'm sorry but this is not up for debate.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rango (talkcontribs) 22:17, May 23 2021 (EDT)
Addendum: "I talked with some Ikecord members and absolutely nobody thought rango should be on the notable players list, and I agree with the assessment" is not a credible reason to remove my entry. As such, the reasoning for removing me holds zero credibility and cannot be substantiated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rango (talkcontribs) 22:31, May 23, 2021 (EDT)
You need to stop edit warring. While you were once not disputed to be notable, it is now being disputed. Perhaps you are right, you do deserve to be on the Ike list, however, you alone don't get to decide that. Now that a dispute has been raised, you cannot say you still belong there until we have discussed the matter, and you have waited an appropriate amount of time for people to refute or confirm it. It doesn't matter how much you think you deserve to be there still, you don't get to decide that. Black Vulpine of the 🦊Furry Nation🐺. Furries make the internets go! :3 22:39, May 23, 2021 (EDT)
Okay and who are "people" exactly? I want to know who's deciding that my results are considered notable.