Talk:Ink (status): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''Bumpng and Supporting this move''' this is a good idea. [[User:S3AHAWK|<span style="font-family: Arial;color:Blue; 0px">S3AHAWK</span>]] ([[User talk:S3AHAWK|''<span style=" font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: Red;">talk</span>'']])[[File:S3AHAWK_Signature_icon_1.png|20px]] 23:18, August 11, 2020 (EDT) | '''Bumpng and Supporting this move''' this is a good idea. [[User:S3AHAWK|<span style="font-family: Arial;color:Blue; 0px">S3AHAWK</span>]] ([[User talk:S3AHAWK|''<span style=" font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: Red;">talk</span>'']])[[File:S3AHAWK_Signature_icon_1.png|20px]] 23:18, August 11, 2020 (EDT) | ||
'''Oppose''' I think the Ink effect is small enough to not warrant a page of its own. It's better, in my opinion, if it stays here with its own small section, especially since the Ink mechanic and the effect often appear together. | |||
Revision as of 23:24, August 11, 2020
Split
Almost forgot that this page covers both the Ink effect and mechanic. Completely support splitting, tag provides all the justification necessary. Acgamer28
17:54, June 22, 2020 (EDT)
I have to agree. Ink (the ammunition) and ink (the status effect) have nothing in common but the name, so I don't see the reason to have them on the same page. Ahemtoday (talk) 18:11, June 22, 2020 (EDT)
Also support. Could be split into pages "Ink (Fighter Ability)" and "Ink (Effect)" maybe? Silva (talk) 04:29, June 25, 2020 (EDT)
- I like this one. Support, but make a Disambiguation page with it.--
Plague von Karma 13:38, June 28, 2020 (EDT) - Support per Plague. Pokebub (talk) 13:46, June 28, 2020 (EDT)
Bumping this: even though there seems to be a clear consensus that we ought to split this page, how exactly should we do this? A page soley on the ink effect will be split off, but how do we name the article about it as a mechanic? Acgamer28 13:34, July 11, 2020 (EDT)
"Ink (ammunition)" and "Ink (effect)", maybe? Ahemtoday (talk) 18:43, July 20, 2020 (EDT)
Bumpng and Supporting this move this is a good idea. S3AHAWK (talk)
23:18, August 11, 2020 (EDT)
Oppose I think the Ink effect is small enough to not warrant a page of its own. It's better, in my opinion, if it stays here with its own small section, especially since the Ink mechanic and the effect often appear together.
