User talk:

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Removing spirit battles[edit]

If you want to remove it, first make a proposal and state reasons as why you should. Major removals like those shouldn't happen without a proposal. CookiesCnC Signature.pngCreme 20:48, September 25, 2019 (EDT)

There already was one. I am acting upon it because no one else has yet. 20:52, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
And where is it? CookiesCnC Signature.pngCreme 20:53, September 25, 2019 (EDT) 20:54, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
This proposal is about spirit battles to stages, not characters. CookiesCnC Signature.pngCreme 20:56, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
It's the same principle. They were using the character pages as a support for it, but then it was said that there was no point to include the battles for at all for either. 21:00, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
Same principal does not mean it was agreed upon. Except for a brief paragraph, no one else talked about the fighter pages and removing the spirit section. Why don't you make your own proposal and see? CookiesCnC Signature.pngCreme 21:05, September 25, 2019 (EDT)

Might as well state this already, do not revert another user's reversion as per SW:1RV. If you have a complaint, bring it to the talk page. CookiesCnC Signature.pngCreme 20:58, September 25, 2019 (EDT)

Then please don't do it to me either. 21:00, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
I was simply undoing it for violating 1RV and bringing it to the talk page. Also, the compromise has already been talked about in the talk page, so instead of complaining about me "edit warring" you should bring up your opinion instead. CookiesCnC Signature.pngCreme 21:02, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
It's how it is on this wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 21:04, September 25, 2019 (EDT)


Policy.png Reminder: There is a policy in place that prohibits multiple reversions of the same edit. Please refrain from reverting an edit that has already been undone. Instead, bring the subject up on the article's associated talk page.

Take this as an admin warning. You cannot bend a consensus for X set of articles and apply it to unrelated Y set, especially when y set is much more viable for the information. SerpentKing 21:16, September 25, 2019 (EDT)

Ok then. 21:31, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
Notice.png This is an IP's talk page. While it's not a requirement to have a username, those that do not can only be recognized by their IP address, which can change over time and/or be assigned to an unrelated user; they can even be shared by multiple users. If this talk page belongs to your IP but its comments are intended for someone else, you may want to login or create an account to eliminate future confusion.