User:Toomai/Why SSB4 should be good

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

This is basically my current opinion on how SSB4 is shaping up, and why it should be a good game. If you see anyone pre-complaining about SSB4 being bad, link them here.

Basically, it boils down to being the third game in a series. I know what you're thinking, "it has 4 right in the name ya doofus". But it's effectively the third game if you look at SSB64 as a prototype, which it was in many ways. Melee and Brawl also fit the pattern of being the first and second games of a series:

  • The first game is good, and the fans gravitate towards it for both legit and dumb reasons.
  • The second game takes what the first game did and changes it up, trying new things, seeing what sticks and what doesn't. Public opinion is split.
  • The third game takes the best of both games and puts them together with new stuff. It's the best of the three.
  • Examples of other series with this pattern: Super Mario Bros 1-2-3, Zelda/Zelda II/A Link to the Past, Metroid/Metroid II/Super Metroid.

Yes, I'm comparing SSB4 to Mario 3 and Super Metroid. Do you somehow disagree?