Editing Talk:Zero-to-death combo
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
== Zero-to-death casual use definition == | == Zero-to-death casual use definition == | ||
I was discussing the definition with a few members on the subreddit and discord and we determined the most common use of the term is the casual use that doesn't necessarily refer to an | I was discussing the definition with a few members on the subreddit and discord and we determined the most common use of the term is the casual use that doesn't necessarily refer to an escapable combo, but instead a series of hits that takes the opponent from 0% to being KOed without getting hit themselves. A user disagreed, and when I edited the wiki they edited it back. I'm not looking to get into an edit war, what are y'all thoughts? Is the casual definition worth having on the page? | ||
[[User:Snitchface|Snitchface]] ([[User talk:Snitchface|talk]]) 15:00, June 12, 2020 (EDT) | [[User:Snitchface|Snitchface]] ([[User talk:Snitchface|talk]]) 15:00, June 12, 2020 (EDT) | ||
:I would say yes, but probably not folded into that paragraph as you were trying to do before. Probably might be better to go for the KIS (Keep It Simple) approach - use something along the lines of, "In more casual settings, a zero-to-death combo is sometimes referred to as any instance where a player is taken from 0% to a KO without them landing a retaliatory hit on their opponent, even if they manage to escape hitstun." And even though those are my own words, I still think it's a bit messy. I would [[SW:CONSENSUS|definitely wait to hear what other people say]] before you go ahead and add anything back. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 20:05, June 12, 2020 (EDT) | :I would say yes, but probably not folded into that paragraph as you were trying to do before. Probably might be better to go for the KIS (Keep It Simple) approach - use something along the lines of, "In more casual settings, a zero-to-death combo is sometimes referred to as any instance where a player is taken from 0% to a KO without them landing a retaliatory hit on their opponent, even if they manage to escape hitstun." And even though those are my own words, I still think it's a bit messy. I would [[SW:CONSENSUS|definitely wait to hear what other people say]] before you go ahead and add anything back. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 20:05, June 12, 2020 (EDT) | ||
