Editing Talk:Character legality
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
#A lot of information in this section is really only surrounding a brief period of time where most players disliked Sonic, not necessarily because of the character himself, but because of how the online metagame sucked. This was around the time "#FixUltimateOnline" became a big thing, as well as ways to combat the crappy online netcode, such as region locks, becoming a thing. Sonic is really just a byproduct of this issue. | #A lot of information in this section is really only surrounding a brief period of time where most players disliked Sonic, not necessarily because of the character himself, but because of how the online metagame sucked. This was around the time "#FixUltimateOnline" became a big thing, as well as ways to combat the crappy online netcode, such as region locks, becoming a thing. Sonic is really just a byproduct of this issue. | ||
#The two videos you linked were specifically regarding Sonic in the online metagame, despite these videos being located in a section on Sonic's offline reputation. | #The two videos you linked were specifically regarding Sonic in the online metagame, despite these videos being located in a section on Sonic's offline reputation. | ||
#Most importantly, outside of the linked events, there has been no evidence for any serious discussion regarding a Sonic ban. People don't like the character, but no one has actually advocated for a ban aside from as a joke or a gimmick event. The entire section, as it stands right now, really just shows that Sonic is not a character people like watching; nothing here actually states any legitimate reason for Sonic ban aside from "not fun to watch", which again can be applied to many other characters. An example of this is what you linked regarding Coinbox and Hungrybox's contemplations, and [https://x.com/LiquidHbox/status/1755650610903318736 the following Tweet] showed many people either disagreeing with the choice to ban Sonic, or making jokes about it | #Most importantly, outside of the linked events, there has been no evidence for any serious discussion regarding a Sonic ban. People don't like the character, but no one has actually advocated for a ban aside from as a joke or a gimmick event. The entire section, as it stands right now, really just shows that Sonic is not a character people like watching; nothing here actually states any legitimate reason for Sonic ban aside from "not fun to watch", which again can be applied to many other characters. An example of this is what you linked regarding Coinbox and Hungrybox's contemplations, and [https://x.com/LiquidHbox/status/1755650610903318736 the following Tweet] showed many people either disagreeing with the choice to ban Sonic, or making jokes about it. Basically, these contemplations are, overall, minor compared to the legitimate discussions that Steve, Kazuya, and Hero had. | ||
These are basically my thoughts, from what the section had. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 21:43, September 1, 2025 (EDT) | These are basically my thoughts, from what the section had. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 21:43, September 1, 2025 (EDT) | ||