SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Oxico

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Archive.png This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.
Result of RfR: Failed primarily due to user inactivity. (Non-bureaucrat close.) Miles (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Oxico[edit]

I am Oxico. I have been a vivid editor to this wiki since before the time it was in Wikia. Now, I could say how I created almost all the Final Smash pages and provided the damage percentages. I could also tell you how I beefed up almost all the movesets. I could also drone on and on about how I have made more than 1500 edits to the main wiki. But, being humble, I will not brag. Instead, I will provde a link to a list of all my contributions to the main namespace, because I know actions speak louder than words.

Votes/Comments[edit]

  • Why do you deserve rollback for just that? Rollback is for reverting vandalism, and while all that extra stuff is a plus, you really wouldn't need it for making over 1500 edits. KP317 (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. You've been gone a lot lately, but when you are online, you are really helping the Wiki. This is not biased. JtM =^] (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. You're active, and that's all that counts for this in my opinion. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. You were put on hold for your request for sysop (seriously, when will they get back on track?), so you at least deserve a chance. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support ^pikamander --Shadowcrest 23:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I move for this request to be closed with the result as "promotion" due to the fact that he's gotten nothing but support for the past 2 weeks.

  • Weak Oppose: You're clearly not a vandal, so I don't think you'd misuse Rollback privileges, but I have to go back to August of this year to find the last time you reverted an edit and of your last 500 edits only 2 were reverts, so I'm not sure I see why you need Rollback privileges. – Defiant Elements 05:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Support Per everyone above this defiant guy. Anyone notice how he opposes everything? 189cca7d1.gifKoopa Claus 189cca7d1.gif 20:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
I've noticed that he opposed all the RfRs up, but I failed to realize how that mattered. Because it doesn't. --Shadowcrest 20:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Of course you agree with him. You'll try and ruin everything you can. Why? It simply makes you feel good. A common slice of evidence that you're an evil person in general. =| 189cca7d1.gifKoopa Claus 189cca7d1.gif 20:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  1. If you can't recognize that was a NPA violation then you have a serious problem.
  2. If you would actually read what I wrote, then you would notice that- unlike DE- I supported Oxico. I merely posted to make it quite plain that saying "Anyone notice how he opposes everything?" is not a valid way to refute his (or any) argument, and it never will be. --Shadowcrest 21:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
LOL WUT Koopa Koopersshell.gif Klaus 22:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I Move For Close In Support. KP317 (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. Defiant Elements.SZL.pngUP/T 01:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)