SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Gutripper

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Result: Granted rollback. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 06:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


Yes I know I was a poor contributor at the start, but I really have changed. During my time as administrator of the Smash Arena, I learned a lot about how to get along with other users and about responsibilty. I have always tried to make good edits, and I do revert vandalism as much as I can. Rollback powers would not be wasted on me. I have a decent amount of reverts, and rollback would help me boost that number.

Thank you --GutripperSpeak if you are worthy 00:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


  • -Y462 says this person is smart and is working hard for smashwiki, even as we speak this person is editing countless pages. 100% for rollback for Gutripper. No, make it 200%. Signed by 264Y - (DiscussionWho Cares? ) 05:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - I honestly don't see why not. He's active and makes decent contributions. Blue Ninjakoopa Happy Holidays 00:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
  • You go girl! - My infamous remark plays back. 'Tripper deserves Rollback powers. -- PikabroPIKACHU! 00:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Care to say why?SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 13:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Because he's active, mature, helpful and reverts vandalism when he finds it. Reverting isn't something you can just do, like editing. There has to be stuff to revert. Besides Smore, we know that you oppose Gutripper. You don't have to keep commenting on other people's support. PikabroPIKACHU! 23:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Even if I supported him, I would have given a reason and asked about yours.SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 23:28, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support:I don't get it...your an awesome user here who is great with handling the vandal wars we have sometimes, yet you don't have rollback already?
Sadly, people tend not to think I'm up for it. GutripperSpeak if you are worthy
  • Support - My friend, you have come a long way from the ignorant moron who told Fyre she was full of herself. Now you are making decent edits, reverting vandalism (which is the whole idea), are active despite huge commitments, and a mature contributor. I'm proud of your progress and I hope that you get this privelege. You deserve it. --Toon Ganondorf (t c) 00:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Why does he deserve it? Your reason doesn't really have anything to do with rollback.SZL (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I think that he will make a good rollbackr because he makes decent edits, is active, reverts vandalism and is mature. I said that. If you disagree, oppose him. --Toon Ganondorf (t c) 23:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Having fun changing your reason to make him seem stupid?Smoreking 2009 is coming! 22:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 01:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Like...?SZL.pngUP/T 01:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Revert vandalism. His edits are good in heart, and he will fight vandalism here when he gets the chance. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 09:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Reliable and trustworthy, but also Pikamander's (in)famous line. Miles (talk) 02:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, you kind of need to put a reason. If "^^^" means the vote above yours, he didn't really put a reason either.SZL.pngUP/T 01:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, I actually did. If you had taken the time to read rather than rushing to get as much reasons to ruin this guy's chances. I have noticed that his has been the only one that you've dissected to question every vot they get. The Steel Avenger Taste my cold steel!
Having fun changing your reason to make him seem stupid? You just added for fighting vandalism. You guys are just making SZL seem like an arrogant cock, and trust me, he isn't.Smoreking 2009 is coming! 22:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support As TG said, the old days of Gutripper going up and PAing Fyre are gone, and I believe that Gutripper has matured enough to turn a new page in his Smashwiki profile. He can only help with rollback, and will be very helpful to Smashwiki with rollback. Friedbeef1 Ho ho ho! 21:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose. I hate to be this guy, but you haven't really reverted much, so why would you need Rollback?SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 23:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
He's active, dude. Isn't that what matters? Anyone can revert, it's the activity that counts. Blue Ninjakoopa Happy Holidays 23:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I reverted vandalism on Clarinet Hawk's page from the stupid loser called Shit Ass Fuckers. Also, I was checking for his other vandalism, but it had already been taken care of. --GutripperSpeak if you are worthy 23:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
I still think SK shouldn't be so harsh with this oppose. You're also mature, something key to having rollback powers. Blue Ninjakoopa Happy Holidays 00:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Notice how I said this guy? That's because somebody(an admin, DE, Shadowcrest, etc.) is going to come by and notice that too, so I just wanted to say it. As with the message I've posted on Gutripper's talk page, he hasn't reverted much, and somebody's going to notice it. And if you think I'm being a dick right now, I'm sorry.SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 00:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Smoreking. Also, if there's not enough vandalism to revert in order for you to run, then wait until there is enough, and then run.SZL.pngUP/T 23:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm just gonna say this as a third-party, and not as a pal/good friend/really cool guy that knows Gutripper. If you wait for enough vandalism (and we get plenty), why should he wait till the last minute to run if some vandal like Willy on Wheels come and mess everything up? There's plenty of vandalism on SW, and we should have more vandal fighters. Friedbeef1 Ho ho ho! 01:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Allow me to rephrase. If there's not enough vandalism for you to revert, then wait until you have reverted enough, then run. OK?SZL.pngUP/T 21:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Slight Support He got some more reverts, and he's reasonably active.SZL.pngUP/T/O 13:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Neutral. Pikamander & Smoreking. BALτʀο [ talk ] 23:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. I refer to Pikamander's infamous quote. Heh... MarioGalaxyTalk 03:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Slight Support. Gutripper is reasonably active and seemingly trustworthy. He has more than a handful of reverts; however, it's unclear from his contributions to what extent reverting vandalism is a part of his normal pattern of editing (i.e. it's unclear how dedicated he is to janitorial/cleanup tasks). Overall, slight support. – Defiant Elements +talk 21:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support.Gutripper has more than a handful of reverts, which is good enough for me. He is also quite active. Y462 (TCE ) 03:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support ^Same reason as stated above^ and Gutripper is also an active contributer.--MỸŠŦЄЯỸЊӘҒҒ TALK 04:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose I heard about this guy around a week ago, and even if you have been here longer then that, I've seen nothing that... Well... Really warrants anything to do with rollback. "Handsome" Hollywood K. 23:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
    You mean aside from, you know, reverting vandalism? Also, what does the fact that you only heard about this guy a week ago have to do with anything? Are you implying that he's too new or something? Fact is that he's been around since October '08... so... – Defiant Elements +talk 00:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
    Well... You would know ab-I'm not even gonna say it. Shadowcrest DefiantElements, I don't see anything that sets him apart from the rest when following your logic of number of reverts. "Handsome" Hollywood K. 00:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
    For a start, I know that you know who I am, so that's a flat out lie. Next point is, just because you've not heard of me doesn't mean anything. Do your research before you mark Strong Oppose. GutripperSpeak
    I didn't know who you were, and I don't need to research n00bs like you. I have every right to put in Oppose, and it may not make the slightest difference but it's staying that way. KP These Rules Are Stupid 07:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
    You need to have reasons. Rollback is based on reverts, not whether you know them or not. Either come up with a decent excuse to oppose, or withdraw your statement. GutripperSpeak
    I don't need to do anything. You are such a -------------- NO. My reason is because you don't have enough reverts. Withdraw that. KP These Rules Are Stupid 07:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
    Okay, I will. 'Tripper has significantly more reverts than Semi, yet you supported Semi, and are now opposing 'Tripper on the basis of too few reverts. Double standard is double? – Defiant Elements +talk 23:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
    Semicolon also has been with this wiki for a long time and IMO is long overdue for Sysop priviledges. Gutripper has an attitude almost as bad as mine (almost) and, I wouldn't consider that significant. Kperfekt722 These Rules Are Stupid 01:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
If he is overdue for Sysop privelliges, then he should run. That shouldn't, and doesn't, affect my number of reverts, which I must remind you, is all this is supposed to be about. GutripperSpeak