Forum:More articles

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Forums: Index Watercooler More articles

I am personally in favor of creating more wiki articles. For instance, upon looking at SW:NOT, I've found that it says non-interactable stage elements don't get pages. But what about the interactable objects? For example, the stage 3D Land has a lot of interactable platforms, such as Note Blocks, Flip Panels, etc. and I think it wouldn't be against policy to give them articles, and they can easily be Super Smash Bros.-specific even with origin sections, because I think even the minor details count. Also, Donut Blocks are being conflated with their Super Smash Bros. iterations, and I think that needs some proper discernment. Conker the Squirrel (talk) 13:11, August 20, 2026 (UTC)

I really don't think that's necessary. There's nothing to actually say or describe about stage objects that can't already be covered by the page. All the information you need is right there, otherwise it just results in lots of short pages with redundant/repeat information. --Flippy (talk) 13:58, August 20, 2026 (UTC)
Stuff like Brick Blocks, on the other hand, are not just in one stage but several. Conker the Squirrel (talk) 14:57, August 20, 2026 (UTC)
Same answer. It's within the scope of pages that already exist and is excessively tangential. --Flippy (talk) 19:25, August 20, 2026 (UTC)
Yeah i don’t see a need for them. It would be make more if we add sections in 3D Land’s page for them. what about y’all? Grand Dad.pngDavidman!!! 17:19, August 22, 2026 (UTC)
Extra sections sounds good to me. My Note Block draft is also turning out too short. Conker the Squirrel (talk) 17:20, August 22, 2026 (UTC)