Editing Forum:General proposals

{{Forumheader|Proposals}}<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
{{Archive box|5}}
[[Category:Proposals|*]]
<center><big><big>'''Welcome to the SmashWiki Proposals page.<br>If you wish to make a new proposal, please do so at the bottom of the page under a new section header.<br>Remember to sign your comments with '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></big></big></center><br><br>
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
<!-- REMEMBER TO SIGN YOUR COMMENTS WITH ~~~~ -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->

== Add a page on Steve's Phantom MLG ==

Steve's PhantomMLG, where he uses an advanced technique to cancel hitstun, is one of the bigger reasons that he was banned in many competitive tournaments. Competitively, it's very useful for him, and I think a page should be added for it.
[[User:CKcoolidge|CKcoolidge]] ([[User talk:CKcoolidge|talk]]) 20:01, May 12, 2025 (EDT)CKcoolidge

== Competitive Play Section Order ==

I think the "Tier placement and history" section should go above the "Notable players" section. Having the players' names listed first wouldn't help anyone who doesn't know how the character does competitively or even who the players are. [[User:Diddy Kongstar|<span style="font-size:10pt;background:#28282B;border:solid FF0000 5px;border-radius: 4px;padding:1px 3px;color:#FF0000">Diddy Kongstar</span>]] 20:30, March 12, 2023 (EDT)
:While I don't really mind either way, I disagree with your point since I feel like most players who look at this section want to know or care more about who a character's best players are rather than a character's competitive history. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 20:52, March 12, 2023 (EDT)
:I don't see how having the players listed before the competitive history won't help people know how the character does competitively, if anything knowing about the players first and their accomplishments will make it easier to understand their competitive history. From a readers' perspective, knowing who plays {{SSBU|Ness}} and their past accomplishments beforehand will let me better understand how good those players are when reading the character's competitive history, and overall gives more context to how good Ness really is. [[File:725.png|20px]] '''[[User:Omega Toad|<font color="red">Omega Toad,</font>]] [[User talk:Omega Toad|<font color="green">the Festive Shiny Litten.</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Omega Toad|<font color="red">(Seasons greetings!)</font>]]''' 21:11, March 12, 2023 (EDT)

== A page about every time Smash franchise referenced an upcoming release. ==

Thinking of every time the series made nods to future games that haven't release yet. It would be a fun experiment. [[User:XeroSchnee20|XeroSchnee20]] ([[User talk:XeroSchnee20|talk]]) 18:49, July 11, 2023 (EDT)
:This is too unspecific and purposeless to support. What notable instances are you referring to, and what would the page even be named? [[User:FunkyGrip2000|FunkyGrip2000]] ([[User talk:FunkyGrip2000|talk]]) 05:04, January 11, 2024 (EST)

== Remove game title mentions from ''Ultimate'' newcomers' special move page openings ==

I've been thinking about removing the mentions of game titles from the opening sentences of special moves used by newcomers from ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate''. This does ''not'' concern special moves that are changed over the course of the series and their respective replacements (e.g. [[Chain]] and [[Burst Grenade]]), and Young Link's [[Triforce Slash]] and Pichu's [[Volt Tackle]] are a whole other can of worms.

As an example, the opening sentence of Ridley's [[Plasma Breath]] would be changed from:
*'''Plasma Breath''' ({{ja|リドリーブレス|Ridorī Buresu}}, ''Ridley Breath'') is {{SSBU|Ridley}}'s [[neutral special move]] in ''[[Super Smash Bros. Ultimate]]''.
To:
*'''Plasma Breath''' ({{ja|リドリーブレス|Ridorī Buresu}}, ''Ridley Breath'') is [[Ridley]]'s [[neutral special move]].

As it is now, these mentions of ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'' come across as '''not uniform''' with moves from prior games, and '''redundant''' with the header icons also listing the subject's appearance(s). I had attempted similar removals in the past with the reason of future-proofing, but [[User talk:Black Vulpine#This|Black Vulpine shut that idea down]]. Still, even in the extreme case ''Ultimate'' is the last ''Smash'' game, I'd rather have all the special move pages look nice and uniform. Then again, I have a major case of OCD, and it's probably just a me problem... What do any of you think? [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 22:25, January 24, 2024 (EST)
:You have a point that this writing choice is inconsistent with prior series entries. I do not think removing it is beneficial for the individual pages, which is likely why Black Vulpine disagreed with the edits, but agree that being consistent across sections is ideal. Because this would be a widespread change, I think everyone would need to be on board with it (probably impossible), or would need to be officially added to the list of 'Things to do' etc.. [[User:FunkyGrip2000|FunkyGrip2000]] ([[User talk:FunkyGrip2000|talk]]) 17:49, February 16, 2024 (EST)
::At the same time, removing these title mentions wouldn't be ''un''beneficial — there's numerous other context clues on these move pages to prove that the moves and their users have only been in ''Ultimate''. '''EDIT:''' I don't think it would be that widespread, either — we're only looking at a modest handful of pages, and some of them already lack a title mention. [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 15:58, February 17, 2024 (EST)

I don't think there will be much, if any, pushback for going ahead with this. Looking at a random sample of move articles shows:
*If a character uses a move in every game, don't mention any games.
*If a character uses a move in one or two games, mention them.
**If that move has been in use since a particular game, saying "since [GAME]" is fine. [[Blaster (Fox)]], [[F.L.U.D.D.]]
**If that move has been in use for three or four games before changing in a particular game, saying "until [GAME]" is fine. [[Bomb (Link)]]
The exceptions to the above is the characters added in Ultimate (except Daisy who was grandfathered in with Peach's articles). Looking at the linked discussion with Black Vulpine, it seems the crux of the issue is the reasoning used. If you say something like "It is [CHAR]'s only [DIRECTION] special, no need to mention [GAME]" or "Simplifying/saving bytes. Don't need to mention every game" would be more acceptable. Heck, "Consistency with how other special move articles word the intro" would be fine, just not "future proofing" which gives no indication on what the edit is about. --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 14:11, March 26, 2024 (EDT)
:Hey, saving bytes is a another good reason to remove these title mentions! Good catch. I should add that [[Hammer Flip]] does not follow the "one or two games" rule — that article should be corrected. Going back to Young Link's Triforce Slash and Pichu's Volt Tackle, should we apply the same logic to them? Their page openings are very clunky, and not mentioning ''Ultimate'' probably wouldn't create the false implication that these characters are in ''Brawl'' and ''Smash 4'' — the special move tables at the bottoms of the pages already account for this. [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 18:59, March 26, 2024 (EDT)
::I wouldn't use what I listed as hard rules, I only looked at like 10 articles. I think Hammer Flip's intro is fine. Volt Tackle can probably be reduced to "Pikachu's and Pichu's Final Smash". For Triforce Slash, I'm thinking "...serves as the Final Smash of Link (prior to ''Ultimate''), Toon Link, and Young Link". --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 19:05, March 26, 2024 (EDT)
:::Okie-dokie. Should we wait for more people to weigh in before we start enacting these changes? [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 19:33, March 26, 2024 (EDT)
::::I don't think it is necessary; the majority of articles are already the one way. BV was the only one who opposed and it was for the wording of the summary. And if anyone has issue with the particular wording of Volt Tackle, Triforce Slash, or similar, they're free to put their own spin on it--at worst they bring it up on a talk page. --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 19:37, March 26, 2024 (EDT)
:::::Well, that settles it, I guess. [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 20:05, March 26, 2024 (EDT)

I've finished removing every title mention in question. If anyone wishes to do any further improvements (e.g. adding links to the games elsewhere on the pages), be my guest. [[User:ShootingStar7X|ShootingStar7X]] ([[User talk:ShootingStar7X|talk]]) 21:14, March 26, 2024 (EDT)

==Missing Hitbox==

Soooo, I've noticed that on Cloud's page (SSBU) there are some missing hitboxes for his Blade Beam move (the actual projectile). Well, believe it or not, I actually found some on Ultimate Frame Data(here's the link: ultimateframedata.com/cloud). Just keep scrolling down, it even shows limit, air, and limit+air comparisons. [[User:YourTypicalSmasher96|YourTypicalSmasher96]] ([[User talk:YourTypicalSmasher96|talk]]) 15:34, April 16, 2024 (EDT)
: We know that there are hitboxes on UFD, it's just that nobody has made a page for it yet. Don't forget the page not only needs the hitbox gif but also the frame data timings at the bottom and hitbox data.

==Make the Spirit Battles table significantly less ugly==
Why do the tables for spirit battles still look like this:

{{SpiritBattleHeader|inspiration=y|s=y|hideseries=y}}
|-
|620
|{{SpiritTableName|Caeda|iw=fireemblem|size=64}}
|•{{SSBU|Lucina}} {{Head|Lucina|g=SSBU|s=20px|cl=White}}<br>•{{SSBU|Marth}} {{Head|Marth|g=SSBU|s=20px|cl=Blue}}
|{{SpiritType|Shield}}
|13,500
|[[Temple]] ([[Battlefield form]])
|•Hazard: Heavy Wind
|•Dangerously high winds are in effect<br>•The enemy has increased move speed and reduced weight
|{{SSBUMusicLink|Fire Emblem|Story 5 Meeting}}
|'''Spirit Battle inspiration:'''
*The white Lucina represents Caeda, a princess who wears white armor with a red tunic and wields a bladed weapon in battle.
*The blue Marth minion is based on his appearance in the Archanea timeline, who serves as the leader of the party that Caeda belongs to.
*The stage and the battle conditions  reference Caeda's Pegasus Knight class, which features a high speed stat and allows her to fly over the battlefield.
*The music track is based on the recruitment theme song of ''Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon'', which plays when Caeda recruits another character into Marth's party.
----'''Other trivia:'''
*This spirit's Shield type and Jump ↑ ability further reference Caeda's Pegasus Knight class, which features a high resistant stat and allows her to fly over the battlefield.
|}

When they could so easily be changed to a much more readable format like this:

{{SpiritBattleHeader|s=y|hideseries=y}}
|-
|620
|{{SpiritTableName|Caeda|iw=fireemblem|size=64}}
|•{{SSBU|Lucina}} {{Head|Lucina|g=SSBU|s=20px|cl=White}}<br>•{{SSBU|Marth}} {{Head|Marth|g=SSBU|s=20px|cl=Blue}}
|{{SpiritType|Shield}}
|13,500
|[[Temple]] ([[Battlefield form]])
|•Hazard: Heavy Wind
|•Dangerously high winds are in effect<br>•The enemy has increased move speed and reduced weight
|{{SSBUMusicLink|Fire Emblem|Story 5 Meeting}}
|-
!colspan=10|''Inspiration''
|-
|colspan=10|'''Spirit Battle inspiration:'''
*The white Lucina represents Caeda, a princess who wears white armor with a red tunic and wields a bladed weapon in battle.
*The blue Marth minion is based on his appearance in the Archanea timeline, who serves as the leader of the party that Caeda belongs to.
*The stage and the battle conditions  reference Caeda's Pegasus Knight class, which features a high speed stat and allows her to fly over the battlefield.
*The music track is based on the recruitment theme song of ''Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon'', which plays when Caeda recruits another character into Marth's party.
----'''Other trivia:'''
*This spirit's Shield type and Jump ↑ ability further reference Caeda's Pegasus Knight class, which features a high resistant stat and allows her to fly over the battlefield.
|}

(Obviously can be tweaked, I just threw this up quickly to showcase the main point of including the HUGE wall of text in its own row instead of squished off to the very far right hand side) [[User:Shadow2|Shadow2]] ([[User talk:Shadow2|talk]]) 16:20, July 1, 2024 (EDT)
:Inviting you and whoever also want to talk about this to read the long discussion started years ago here: https://www.ssbwiki.com/Talk:List_of_spirits_(disambiguation)
:We didn't manage to convince enough people back then, I'm hoping you'll do better, because the spirit pages really need it. [[User:YoshiRyu|YoshiRyu]] ([[User talk:YoshiRyu|talk]]) 03:03, July 2, 2024 (EDT)
::Looks like part of the issue from those previous discussions is the proposers over-complicating their proposals. My proposal here is simple: Text is squished, make it not squish. [[User:Shadow2|Shadow2]] ([[User talk:Shadow2|talk]]) 03:39, July 2, 2024 (EDT)
:::Someone proposed pretty much the same thing you just did here. Personnally, I still thing the "inspiration" should be a entirely separate table, if for anything else, at least because spirits that don't have a battle can still have a trivia point about their type or effect or whatever. I didn't edit my [[User:YoshiRyu/Sandbox|sandbox]] since then, and it still display the end result, which still look nice to me to this day, if anyone want to have a look at it... [[User:YoshiRyu|YoshiRyu]] ([[User talk:YoshiRyu|talk]]) 06:43, July 2, 2024 (EDT)

== Fix the dead YouTube links on each of the music pages ==

For a while now, all of the YouTube links to listen to each song have been dead. Either we should replace them with new unlisted videos (I have the ability to rip the SSBU OST just fine)

Or we should embed the audio directly into the page like how wikis like WiKirby do it. [[User:Bakedroyal727|Bakedroyal727]] ([[User talk:Bakedroyal727|talk]]) 14:47, December 29th, 2024 (EST)

==Add Movesets/Most Used Special Moves for Mii Players==
The Miis are unique, as their playstyle can be dramatically shifted from the special moves they can pick. Considering how different Mii players use different movesets, I find it fit that for each Mii player, on their Smasher page, a section could be added for their moveset. If a player uses some specials interchangeably, or  swaps moves/movesets frequently, both would be included. The way I could see it, it would be included in the Infobox, listing the special as 1, 2, or 3 as it does ingame, while linking back to the page. A section could work, but I'd find it too obtrusive compared to the simplicity of including it within the Infobox itself. [[User:CanadianCrayon|CanadianCrayon]] ([[User talk:CanadianCrayon|talk]]) 13:43, March 26, 2025 (EDT)
:While I do support adding Mii Brawler movesets to Smasher pages (and the MHSP section while we are at it), I think adding it to the Infobox the way we have the Infobox now would end up causing several issues (mainly, if a Mii Brawler is a main, we can't simply add anything other than the character's name itself or else it would redirect to a redlink). I also agree a section is a bit too obtrusive and is, quite frankly, a bit unnecessary. The best I can think of at the moment is to include it in the introduction, where it can be properly explained the most common set of moves a player uses, but I do admit that is also not completely perfect. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 15:28, April 4, 2025 (EDT)

== Add a page on Steve's Phantom MLG ==
Steve has an advanced technique called Phantom MLG, which allows him to cancel hitstun, is one of the bigger reasons that he was banned in many competitive tournaments. Competitively, it's very useful for him, and I think a page should be added for it. [[User:CKcoolidge|CKcoolidge]] ([[User talk:CKcoolidge|talk]]) 20:01, May 12, 2025 (EDT)
:A proposal for this isn't needed, someone just needs to get around to making it. A lot of the editors aren't familiar enough with what is involved in the technique to make the page, hence why no one has made it yet. --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 20:09, May 12, 2025 (EDT)

== Remove the customization section from most* Sm4sh DLC Fighters' Special move pages ==

<nowiki>*</nowiki> This proposal only applies to fighters with completely novel special moves. For fighters whose specials are shared (as is the case for [[PK_Freeze#Customization|Lucas]]), I feel like having the section adds value, so I'd vote to leave them.

Currently, each fighter's special move pages (the game-agnostic ones, not the game-specific) who appeared in ''Smash 4'' have a section titled '''Customization''' which is about the unlockable variants, aka the [[custom move]]s. This even applies to [[Downloadable_content_(SSB4)#Fighters|DLC Fighters]], who, being additions to the game after its release, lacked custom move variants of their specials; this leads to every '''Customization''' section for these fighters' specials reading like this:

:Special Move customization was added in ''[[Super Smash Bros. 4]]''. These are the variations:
:''Picture of the move''
:# '''Move Name''': Default.
:Like the other DLC characters, ''Fighter Name'' has no custom move variations.

Not only are these sections entirely redundant, I feel they're confusing for newcomers to the wiki. That is why I vote to remove them. [[User:Mariogeek2|Mariogeek2]] ([[User talk:Mariogeek2|talk]]) 20:00, July 14, 2025 (EDT)
:Bumped, no replies [[User:Mariogeek2|Mariogeek2]] ([[User talk:Mariogeek2|talk]]) 22:21, July 24, 2025 (EDT)
::Another bump [[User:Mariogeek2|Mariogeek2]] ([[User talk:Mariogeek2|talk]]) 11:21, August 3, 2025 (EDT)
:I think they should be kept as there is still the image, description, name, and all of that is accessed through the same customization menu like those with variants. But it should instead be reworded/reorganized. Instead of mentioning the lack of customs at the very end, it should be listed earlier. Replacing the second sentence and have it read, "Special Move customization was added in Super Smash Bros. 4. Like the other DLC characters, FIGHTER has no custom move variations." would be fine in my opinion. --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 11:46, August 3, 2025 (EDT)
::Thanks, appreciate the feedback :D
::[[User:Mariogeek2|Mariogeek2]] ([[User talk:Mariogeek2|talk]]) 11:56, August 3, 2025 (EDT)
:::I have to agree with CanvasK. There's still information to cover from the games themselves regardless, but it could probably stand to be reworded/reorganized. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Gamer'''</span>]] 12:22, August 3, 2025 (EDT)
::::Sounds good! I guess we can consider this topic closed, I'll get onto it straightaway. [[User:Mariogeek2|Mariogeek2]] ([[User talk:Mariogeek2|talk]]) 18:02, August 3, 2025 (EDT)
	You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.
	Log in	Create account
Insert common text
Signature	~~~~
Symbols	£ ¥ ° ± × ÷ € ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥
Diacritics	À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö Ø Œ Ù Ú Û Ü Ý Þ ß à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï ð ñ ò ó ô õ ö ø œ ù ú û ü ý þ ÿ
Wikitext	[] [[]] \| [[Category:]] [[File:]] #REDIRECT: [[]] {\| \|- \|\| \|}
Templates	{{cleanup}} {{image}} {{reflist}} {{stub}} {{d}} {{delete}}
Formatting	<!----> <br> <code></code> <gallery></gallery> <nowiki></nowiki> <ref></ref> <references/> {{#widget:YouTube\|id=}}
Substitution	<includeonly></includeonly> <noinclude></noinclude>