|
|
| (29 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| There, all fixed up. Cafinator approves! [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 15:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC) | | There, all fixed up. Cafinator approves! [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 15:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| == Nonsense? ==
| | I sometimes try something new, play baseball with a homerun bat, and a Mr. Saturn :) [[User:Learner4|Learner4]] ([[User talk:Learner4|talk]]) 19:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| How is this nonsense? This makes perfect sense, and Taunt Matches ''do'' exist. Go onto Wifi with Captain Falcon and use his down Taunt, and people will join, ''that's'' a Taunt Match. [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 02:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| | {|align="right" style="border: solid 1px #CCC; padding: 1px; background-color:#FCFCFC" |
| | |- |
| | |<center>[[Image:Replacement filing cabinet.svg|40px|Archives]]</center> |
| | |- |
| | |<center>'''Archives'''</center> |
| | ---- |
| | [[/Archive1|1]] |
| | |} |
|
| |
|
| Well, time to get the bolded letters out.
| | It's so much fun being cheap with only 3 characters in a taunt match, I just choose Kirby, Metaa Knight, and King Dedede, since I love Kirby a lot.--StrawberryFlowermaster42 21:07, November 1, 2009 (UTC)StrawberryFlowermaster42 |
|
| |
|
| '''Keep.''' Cafinator worked hard on this page, and there are such things as Taunt Matches. I don't understand why they put "Nonsense" as a reason. Taunt Matches are nonsense, I'll admit that, but this article isn't. [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 02:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| | ==Delete== |
|
| |
|
| '''Keep.''' [[User:ItemHazard|ItemHazard]] ([[User talk:ItemHazard|talk]]) 03:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | | Having a page with info about messing around and being annoying is unnecessary. '''Delete''' [[User:Boo Buddy|<span style="color:#00FF00">Boo</span>]] [[User talk:Boo Buddy|<span style="color:#6ba500">Buddy</span>]] [[File:MeganiumMS.png|x20px|link=]] 12:15, 28 January 2014 (EST) |
| | :'''Oppose''' I think we should keep it. It's become popular enough to warrant an article. <span style="font-family:AR JULIAN; font-size:12pt">[[User:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:blue">Chuck</span>]][[User talk:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:blue">Norris</span>]]</span>[[File:24.png|23px]] 12:24, 28 January 2014 (EST) |
| | :'''Oppose''' As stupid as it is, I'd call it notable enough to have an article, as it's like the only thing you'll ever see in basic brawl, and it's one of the primary reasons why nearly every serious player hates the basic brawl mode (the [[Basic Brawl]] article also mentions this). [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 12:29, 28 January 2014 (EST) |
| | :'''Oppose''' Its defiantly notable. We could however merge this with stalling. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Link OoT Dots.PNG|16px]] The Bullet 12:33, 28 January 2014 (EST) |
|
| |
|
| '''Keep.''' Taunt Matches are quite common and many people might want to find out information about them. When players go on Basic Brawl and sees players taunting, they might want to find out why the players are taunting. EDIT: I agree with Cafinator, Taunt Matches may seem nonsense, but it's an actual term or event that people do, ergo, a page containing information about it seems useful. [[User:Urbzsims|Urbzsims]] ([[User talk:Urbzsims|talk]]) 03:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | | '''Oppose''' Notable enough. [[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 22:44, 15 February 2014 (EST) |
| | |
| Well, it's unanimous. '''Keep''' got the most votes, so there's no need to delete this. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cafinator|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small>
| |
| | |
| The deletion discussion is still open because (a) it was an hour old before the deletion tag was removed and (b) a sysop hasn't closed it. It would have been nice if the nominator had left a comment explaining the nomination in greater detail, however. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 05:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Hmph. Well, what are your thoughts on this, then? [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 05:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| '''Undecided:''' It gets a few hits on Google, but it's for obscure YouTube vids and a forum discussion. If someone can prove that this is gaining popularity, I suppose it can stay. '''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' - <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 08:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| '''Keep'''. I see Taunt Matches on Wi-Fi all the time. - [[User:Amycats2|Amycats2]] ([[User talk:Amycats2|talk]]) 12:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| '''Keep'''. I've been in like 20 of these on Wi-Fi, with random people. [[User:Smorekingxg456|Smorekingxg456]] ([[User talk:Smorekingxg456|talk]]) 13:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| For a real player, ending up stuck in a "taunt match" is the most frustrating thing on WiFi and tends to be facilitated by people who can somehow stay easily entertained listening to "Pee-ka-choo-pee-ka-choo" for the duration of an entire match, who then proceed to do it again next round. I don't understand what sort of player enjoys this on a repeat basis, but I can't deny its existence and although it's a facet of play that I have no concept of, I guess it's notable enough for an article. I'll do everything I can to resist putting [[Image:Retard.jpg]] at the top. :^) --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 14:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| '''Keep.''' But real players use the Friend Finder, of course. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 17:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Randall, you're supposed to vote, not leave your opinion on an article. Oh, that reminds me:
| |
| | |
| '''Keep'''; I don't recall ever being in a taunt match that lasted the whole match, but I do recall people taunting at the beginning of some of my matches. Oh, and Randall, it's, "Pikachu". [[User:MarioGalaxy|<span style="color:Gold">Mario</span><span style="color:Silver">Galaxy</span>]] {[[User talk:MarioGalaxy|<span style="color:Gray">talk</span>]]} 17:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :This is a talk page for discussion related to the article. The notion that you are ''supposed'' to "vote" and then ''not'' leave your opinion on the article is ridiculous. A vote counts for nothing if you can't provide a reason for your decision. And remember that this isn't a straight democracy; just because there's ten people saying "Keep" doesn't mean that it won't get deleted based on three people who come to a reasonable conclusion about lack of article notability through discussion. Remember, "having the most votes" and "reaching consensus" are not the same thing. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 18:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :: There's no requirement to vote because deletion discussions aren't a "vote" per se. Still, Randall gave his opinion on whether the article should be kept, so I don't see why you're going out of your way to criticize him. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 17:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Fine, whatever. But he might as well say '''Keep''' or '''Delete''' while he's at it. '''[[User:MarioGalaxy|<span style="color:Gold">Mario</span><span style="color:Silver">Galaxy</span>]]''' {[[User talk:MarioGalaxy|<span style="color:Gray">talk</span>]]} 18:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| '''Keep''' Why was this even put up for deletion? Taunt matches are fun! [[User:Cheezperson|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="aquamarine">Cheezperson</font>]] ([[User talk:Cheezperson|speak to the big cheez]])
| |
| | |
| '''Delete'''. i agree it is an actual term, but the other person your fighting will just kill you with ease, and the match will go on with you taunting whil the other person kos you. the only way the other person won't fight, is if you two already talked it over before hand [[User:JtM|JtM =^]]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 20:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| '''Delete'''. I go online every day, and the closest I ever got to a "Taunt Match" was merely two unresponsive players. but whether this was intentional or not in unclear. [[User:Gargomon251|Gargomon251]] ([[User talk:Gargomon251|talk]]) 20:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::Usually, they are planned ahead with friends. Oh, and just because you are annoyed with taunt matches doesn't mean they don't exist. Because these taunt matches exist, it is only fitting that this page stays on the wiki. [[User:Cheezperson|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="aquamarine">Cheezperson</font>]] ([[User talk:Cheezperson|speak to the big cheez]])
| |
| '''Keep.''' While personally I dislike these kind of matches, they certainly are a real occurrence.[[User:Entrea Sumatae|<span style="color:#4682b4">'''–Entrea Sumatae'''</span>]] 21:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |
| | |
| '''Keep.''' Sure, it may not be the most enjoyable type of matches, but it's a common occurence on With Anyone fights and (though less often) With Friends matches. I mean, if you were looking for an actual fair fight, I wouldn't recommend doing a 4-player timed match with items. That's not what you would define as "serious", y'know? [[User:Shade487z|Shade]] ([[User talk:Shade487z|talk]]) 00:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | |
| | |
| Current count:
| |
| | |
| ''Votes'': 12
| |
| | |
| '''Keep:'''10
| |
| '''Delete:'''2
| |
| | |
| It's very one-sided. So far, the only reasons people have for deleting is, "I never had seen one," and "I don't like them." [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 04:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Pikachu's taunts ==
| |
| Are Pikachu's taunts often used in taunt matches, because I heard some people who say that Pikachu has the most annoying taunts in the game?[[Special:Contributions/142.59.91.42|142.59.91.42]] 23:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| why would it matter? all taunts are annoying when you do then repeatedly [[User:JtM|JtM =^]]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 00:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Not all taunts are annoying. Zelda, Snake, Olimar's taunt aren't really annoying. [[User:Urbzsims|Urbzsims]] ([[User talk:Urbzsims|talk]]) 00:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :::It depends on the person. Generally though, Pikachu, Sonic, and Pit are considered the kings of annoying taunts. [[User:Cheezperson|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="aquamarine">Cheezperson</font>]] ([[User talk:Cheezperson|speak to the big cheez]])
| |
| :Yeah, and Olimar's down taunt is the best taunt ever. [[User:Shade487z|Shade]] ([[User talk:Shade487z|talk]]) 00:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Well, I like it. I use Olimar's down-taunt and his whistle during Taunt Matches. [[User:Cafinator|Cafinator]] ([[User talk:Cafinator|talk]]) 02:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
Woohoo! Someone made it! I love Taunt Matches, but it isn't limited to just Wifi. Cafinator (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
There, all fixed up. Cafinator approves! Cafinator (talk) 15:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
I sometimes try something new, play baseball with a homerun bat, and a Mr. Saturn :) Learner4 (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Archives
1
|
It's so much fun being cheap with only 3 characters in a taunt match, I just choose Kirby, Metaa Knight, and King Dedede, since I love Kirby a lot.--StrawberryFlowermaster42 21:07, November 1, 2009 (UTC)StrawberryFlowermaster42
Having a page with info about messing around and being annoying is unnecessary. Delete Boo Buddy 
12:15, 28 January 2014 (EST)
- Oppose I think we should keep it. It's become popular enough to warrant an article. ChuckNorris
12:24, 28 January 2014 (EST)
- Oppose As stupid as it is, I'd call it notable enough to have an article, as it's like the only thing you'll ever see in basic brawl, and it's one of the primary reasons why nearly every serious player hates the basic brawl mode (the Basic Brawl article also mentions this). Scr7
(talk · contribs) 12:29, 28 January 2014 (EST)
- Oppose Its defiantly notable. We could however merge this with stalling. Dots (talk)
The Bullet 12:33, 28 January 2014 (EST)
Oppose Notable enough. RoyboyX Talk 22:44, 15 February 2014 (EST)
