Talk:Super Mario Bros. 2

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Revision as of 22:51, August 17, 2010 by Mr. Anon (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Everyone freeze...

It's clear Anon was reverting for the sake of reverting (revenge? Lol? Wild claim, but still...), but Dr. Pain has a point. I'm inclined to believe him since that's what I know as well. As for the image, it does not belong, as it is not relevant. We're not the Super Mario Wiki. BNK [E|T|C] 02:39, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

OK first of all what's wrong with the official art? Second of all, about the Luigi jumping thing, this. Thirdly, according to the one revert rule, technically BNK violated it first, although I admit I too went out of line. Anon 02:40, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Discussions about policy violations don't belong here. They belong on user talk pages. And how is box art irrelevant? If you want an in-game pic, upload one yourself and quit whining. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE) Dp99.png 02:42, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
And, uh, I cant find it on that page Anon. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE) Dp99.png 02:44, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Keep looking. Also, about the art thing, it's especially useful in this case as there are two games with this title. Sir Anon the great 02:46, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
In the "differences" section, it says "Luigi can jump 1 block higher than Mario". And about the edit war thing, sorry about that. Sir Anon the great 02:47, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Dr. Pain, please read the release date in the infobox. It really isn't hard. Really!
Secondly, no one is "whining". Come on.
Third, I do rest my case on the origin of Luigi's higher origin.
Last, we do not need box art here. Try Gamehiker if you like looking at the image, and I can't magically obtain software needed to take and upload a picture of the SMB2 masterpiece. BNK [E|T|C] 02:49, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
I meant "the origin of Luigi's higher jump". BNK [E|T|C] 02:49, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
About the boxart, you are right, it's not absolutely necessary, but it's helpful to viewers who wish to look at the page, as well as for the reason I stated above. Sir Anon the great 02:51, August 18, 2010 (UTC)