Talk:Queensland Power Rankings: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


:::::Sorry to be a bother. But, isn't anyone... concerned about the lack of proof in this 50% of the content? If there's no proof, couldn't people write anything and pass it off as true, as long as it sounded true? Is anyone working toward fixing this? [[User:Mako Shark|Mako Shark]] ([[User talk:Mako Shark|talk]]) 05:01, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
:::::Sorry to be a bother. But, isn't anyone... concerned about the lack of proof in this 50% of the content? If there's no proof, couldn't people write anything and pass it off as true, as long as it sounded true? Is anyone working toward fixing this? [[User:Mako Shark|Mako Shark]] ([[User talk:Mako Shark|talk]]) 05:01, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
::::::Gee, that'd be great. If only there was a giant, accessable database with the collective knowledge of the Smash community brought together into some kind of encyclopedia, subject to the input of trusted users as the method of fact checking? Oh wait...[[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 05:17, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:17, April 24, 2010

This page is over three years outdated, does not specify which game its players are ranked for, and cites no references.

Deletion?

Mako Shark (talk) 04:16, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

When we severed our ties to the professional community, they severed ties to us. Yes, the content is outdated, but it still has content imo. Semicolon (talk) 04:40, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
What do you mean, 'severed ties' with the professional community? Also, yes, it is content, but there's no proof that it is (or was) accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mako Shark (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}
I mean we're no longer a Smashboards project. We used to be. And no, there's no proof it's accurate, like close to 50% of the content on this wiki. Please sign your posts. Semicolon (talk) 04:55, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to be a bother. But, isn't anyone... concerned about the lack of proof in this 50% of the content? If there's no proof, couldn't people write anything and pass it off as true, as long as it sounded true? Is anyone working toward fixing this? Mako Shark (talk) 05:01, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
Gee, that'd be great. If only there was a giant, accessable database with the collective knowledge of the Smash community brought together into some kind of encyclopedia, subject to the input of trusted users as the method of fact checking? Oh wait...Semicolon (talk) 05:17, April 24, 2010 (UTC)