Talk:PlatinumGames: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New Page: ==Delete== I object to delete. Even if Platinum doesn't own the Bayonetta, but everyone known that the series are made independently by them, and Sega was not involved, it is unreasonab...)
 
(→‎Tencent: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Delete==
==Delete==
I object to delete. Even if Platinum doesn't own the Bayonetta, but everyone known that the series are made independently by them, and Sega was not involved, it is unreasonable to ignore Platinum simply because there is no IP.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 10:35, July 25, 2019 (EDT)
I object to delete. Even if Platinum doesn't own the Bayonetta, but everyone known that the series are made independently by them, and Sega was not involved, it is unreasonable to ignore Platinum simply because there is no IP.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 10:35, July 25, 2019 (EDT)
== Tencent ==
Since Platinum Games Was bought out by Tencent and Is now a subsidiary of said company, I think we should change it to "Subsidiary" and note that they are owned by Tencent. [[User:AgedofallStrings|AgedofallStrings]] ([[User talk:AgedofallStrings|talk]]) 18:32, March 9, 2021 (EST)

Revision as of 19:32, March 9, 2021

Delete

I object to delete. Even if Platinum doesn't own the Bayonetta, but everyone known that the series are made independently by them, and Sega was not involved, it is unreasonable to ignore Platinum simply because there is no IP.--Capstalker (talk) 10:35, July 25, 2019 (EDT)

Tencent

Since Platinum Games Was bought out by Tencent and Is now a subsidiary of said company, I think we should change it to "Subsidiary" and note that they are owned by Tencent. AgedofallStrings (talk) 18:32, March 9, 2021 (EST)