Talk:Double Team

Can someone remove the speculation? I've heard at least 5 different names for this attack, not limited to Me First, Reversal, or Detect. Who decided it's counter? And counter doesn't even mention Lucario! Gargomon251 04:39, February 26, 2008 (EST)

just keep changing it back to "Lucario's Down-B" until we get a legit name. if someone keeps speculating, report them to an admin. they might get a temporary ban if they don't learn to play by the rules. FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 23:52, February 26, 2008 (EST)

Countering From Behind

I think the statement that Lucario HAS to be hit from the front should be taken out, as I have successfully had double team work when hit from behind numerous times. I even just went into training mode, had Ike use a Neutral B on Lucario from behind, and successfully had Lucario counter Ike. 71.122.202.181 00:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC) Joete

Evasion Clause

Does anyone even use that anymore? It's fairly simple to find an attack or ability that negates all accuracy/evade, and in the time it takes to set up, the Pokemon could easily be knocked out. - Gargomon251 02:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Very few people would actually try to use moves like that, but in every tournament I have heard of they use the Evasion Clause anyway. (It is also an option in Shoddy Battle, an accurate online pokemon battle simulator.) Klepto 03:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

With all due respect, that sounds like a scrub technique, like no items. It's fairly easy to counter and using Haze or switching either Pokemon, as applicable, completely nullifies it. This isn't like making a team of ubers or something. - Gargomon251 07:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

While I don't completely agree with the evasion clause, if you do a google search of all the differemt clauses (like the freeze/sleep clause, self-destruct clause, item clause, species clause, etc) the evasion clause is almost always listed as well. Klepto 20:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)