Talk:Blaster (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
MarioGalaxy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
When no Sysops are involved...then the users create how the vote should be done.and since we are the users we can choose a democratic system...and by that system the result is un merge no? - [[User:Hatake91|Hatake91]] ([[User talk:Hatake91|talk]]) 22:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | When no Sysops are involved...then the users create how the vote should be done.and since we are the users we can choose a democratic system...and by that system the result is un merge no? - [[User:Hatake91|Hatake91]] ([[User talk:Hatake91|talk]]) 22:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
=== Finally === | |||
We finally put the articles in the format I suggested. [[User:MarioGalaxy|MarioGalaxy]] ([[User talk:MarioGalaxy|talk]]) 22:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:53, August 13, 2008
Did it really need a merge? Nobody even added a category... (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 21:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC))
Yep
Sorry but I got sick of seein' Blaster next to parentheses.
- --Blue Ninjakoopa (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Is that a good reason? Other members did not want it merged, their opinions (as well as mine, I recall saying "no") matter. (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 21:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC))
- On another note, opinions of the community do matter. That being said, I shall quote Silverdragon706 regarding Fire Wolf, Fire Fox, etc.
Individual attacks of characters get their own pages. Putting Fox's, Falco's, and Wolf's side-attacks onto one page is just too much. Stuff like Link's bombs and T/Y Link's bombs get their own pages, so these do, too.
(Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 21:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC))
Well, I don't mind. It doesn't make much of a difference, and there's not much of a negative side to merging them, really. 69.12.204.63 21:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
You don't mind. Please, keep in mind, that you are not the only one here. I, for one, do mind. I thought they were fine where they were. As did others, considering the outcome of the "vote". (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 21:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC))
When no Sysops are involved...then the users create how the vote should be done.and since we are the users we can choose a democratic system...and by that system the result is un merge no? - Hatake91 (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Finally
We finally put the articles in the format I suggested. MarioGalaxy (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)