Smasher talk:CPU: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (1 revision: pages) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wait, that's it? He played at this one tournament, and then vanished? This article seems pretty sparse of info. --[[Special:Contributions/160.39.188.134|160.39.188.134]] 16:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC) | Wait, that's it? He played at this one tournament, and then vanished? This article seems pretty sparse of info. --[[Special:Contributions/160.39.188.134|160.39.188.134]] 16:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:He beat Ken at Evo 2008, thanks to the dumb idea that items should be on medium. He abused ROBs final smash en route to a rather controversial victory over Ken Hoang. Once items were banned in tourneys, he has made no noticeable impact to my knowledge. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:33, April 9, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Items were also used at EVO.thats not skill [[User:JtM|JtM =^]]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 20:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | Items were also used at EVO.thats not skill [[User:JtM|JtM =^]]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 20:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Should there be a note concerning all the controversy CPU has gotten for beating Ken in a VERY controversial tournament? Also, I don't think the stages of the matches matter. [[User:Capefeather|capefeather]] ([[User talk:Capefeather|talk]]) 21:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | Should there be a note concerning all the controversy CPU has gotten for beating Ken in a VERY controversial tournament? Also, I don't think the stages of the matches matter. [[User:Capefeather|capefeather]] ([[User talk:Capefeather|talk]]) 21:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
I don't think CPU should've been on here, the only reason he beaten Ken was because he abused the Final Smash and items, and that's not skill it's a skill that noobs only use. If there was no items, Ken would've won, there might've also been a possible chance that he wouldn't have retiredfrom Super Smash Bros.--[[User:Ryou Seiji|Ryou Seiji]] ([[User talk:Ryou Seiji|talk]]) 14:58, June 11, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:This is arguable. While CPU did abuse items, he abused them well. What I'm saying is, despite how over-powered the items are, CPU didn't win through chance. I agree Ken would have won without items, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Ken should be considered more skilled. It's like saying that a Meta Knight player would have won in a tourney if Norfair was legal, so he is more skilled than the other player who beat him. [[Special:Contributions/124.171.84.193|124.171.84.193]] 02:29, September 12, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:46, October 1, 2010
Wait, that's it? He played at this one tournament, and then vanished? This article seems pretty sparse of info. --160.39.188.134 16:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
- He beat Ken at Evo 2008, thanks to the dumb idea that items should be on medium. He abused ROBs final smash en route to a rather controversial victory over Ken Hoang. Once items were banned in tourneys, he has made no noticeable impact to my knowledge. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:33, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Items were also used at EVO.thats not skill JtM =^] (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Controversy section?[edit]
Should there be a note concerning all the controversy CPU has gotten for beating Ken in a VERY controversial tournament? Also, I don't think the stages of the matches matter. capefeather (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't think CPU should've been on here, the only reason he beaten Ken was because he abused the Final Smash and items, and that's not skill it's a skill that noobs only use. If there was no items, Ken would've won, there might've also been a possible chance that he wouldn't have retiredfrom Super Smash Bros.--Ryou Seiji (talk) 14:58, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
- This is arguable. While CPU did abuse items, he abused them well. What I'm saying is, despite how over-powered the items are, CPU didn't win through chance. I agree Ken would have won without items, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Ken should be considered more skilled. It's like saying that a Meta Knight player would have won in a tourney if Norfair was legal, so he is more skilled than the other player who beat him. 124.171.84.193 02:29, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
