SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Waiting: new section) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Out of your reasons suggested, a specific time, like 2 months. Whether they've improved is highly opinionated, and will cause some arguments.'''<span style="border:2px outset #fc2;background-color:silver;-moz-border-radius:24px">[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:Blue;">Smoreking</span>]] [[User talk:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:Gold">2009 is coming!</span>]]</span>''' 14:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | :Out of your reasons suggested, a specific time, like 2 months. Whether they've improved is highly opinionated, and will cause some arguments.'''<span style="border:2px outset #fc2;background-color:silver;-moz-border-radius:24px">[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:Blue;">Smoreking</span>]] [[User talk:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:Gold">2009 is coming!</span>]]</span>''' 14:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I don't think having a set time is an issue. If the person fails once and puts him/herself back up too soon it will just fail again. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 19:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ::I don't think having a set time is an issue. If the person fails once and puts him/herself back up too soon it will just fail again. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 19:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Waiting == | |||
Pikamander's has been up since November 5<sup>th</sup>, and Shadowcrest has been up since November 15<sup>th</sup>. I understand Clarinet Hawk has to make an important decision, but I think 3 months is enough. [[Image:SZL.png|45px]][[User:SZL|'''<span style="color:lime">UP</span>]]/[[User talk:SZL|<span style="color:firebrick">T</span>]]/[[User:SZL/Overhaul|<span style="color:navy">O</span>]]''' 01:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:55, January 10, 2009
 |
When?
So...when's the big day? Is there a time table? --Oxico (talk) 00:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, there is not a set time for any of the RfA's here. It is entirely up to Clarinet Hawk as to when they will close and how they will close. --Shadowcrest 00:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Minor question
Just because I expect it will come up at some point, I think there should be some official statement of how long a user whose RfA failed has to wait before they are allowed to run again. I would think perhaps two months or something of that sort, or maybe saying that they can run again when they feel they've accopmlished enough more to make a difference. Miles (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Out of your reasons suggested, a specific time, like 2 months. Whether they've improved is highly opinionated, and will cause some arguments.Smoreking 2009 is coming! 14:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think having a set time is an issue. If the person fails once and puts him/herself back up too soon it will just fail again. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 19:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Waiting
Pikamander's has been up since November 5th, and Shadowcrest has been up since November 15th. I understand Clarinet Hawk has to make an important decision, but I think 3 months is enough. 
UP/T/O 01:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
