Forum:Smash Wiki: The Movie: Part 2

Forums: Index → Watercooler → Smash Wiki: The Movie: Part 2

Smash Wiki: The Movie: Part 2: Prepare for Violated Expectations Is Here! And So is a New Forum About It!

Yeah. This one stinks, but just so you guys don't totally lose confidence in us, we're going (to try) to release a trailer for part 3 (which will surpass any expectation you ever, ever had for anything retarded) sometime very soon.

<youtube>FhaHlwOghB8</youtube>

Anyway, this is part 2. I did this when I was supposed to be studying for midterms, while I was burned out during midterms, and way after I cared about animating in MSPaint. That's why part 3 is completely live action. So basically, look forward for part 3 coming earliest in 2 weeks. We have our huge tournament this and next weekend so that'll slow things down. Anyway, I hope I can get at least one laugh. Maybe. Semicolon (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

... Yeah... JtM =^] (talk) 05:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I loved it, but I guess that could be because I connected with it. But I am going to ask: do you really consider me a troll? :( --Shadowcrest 05:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Not at all. We had to have some plot continuity. How else was I going to get Willy on Wheels involved if not for some cleverly placed treachery? Thanks for being my plot device, Shadowcrest. Semicolon (talk) 05:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I wasn't in a cleverly placed cameo this time : ( Hopefully there will be a LIVE ACTION CHEEZ PERSON next time. I didn't like this one so much, but, then again, sequels are never as good. I still have high expectations for a live-action sequel, though... on wheels. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 06:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Who?

Who is willy on wheels? Solar flute (talk)

Only the most famous vandalist ever! A sysop could probably explain the whole story to you better than I could. Cheezperson {talk}stuff

He was a page moving vandal from like, 2005 and 2006 on Wikipedia. Generally, he moves page names from "x" to "x ON WHEELS" or some variant of it. Rather famous in the wiki community. --Sky (t · c · w) 14:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

WHAT ABOUT ME?????

Why wasn't I in it? ParaGoomba348 (C'mon, just talk to me) 12:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

possibly because you don't vandalize and arent a sysoop. Those people are the most important JtM =^] (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

--> Shadowcrest 15:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes but youre like an admin. JtM =^] (talk) 15:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, why wasn't he? Red Heart (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm not in it. Crap. Can I be in the third? Masterman What's the matter? Scared?

I want to be in it too. - GalaxiaD (talk) 21:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm surprised, GXD, that you weren't mentioned in the first one with most of the AD. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Sequels are never better.

And seeing as the first one was bad enough...CAFINATOR ^Indeed 00:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

So let me get this straight...

Since I don't have any higher-up position other than just being a normal editor (nor do I do enough to get anything), all I have to do to be in this movie is argue, be a troll, and vandalize? Why don't good people get a role!? I could be...like...idk...some random victim for the next great evil or something! Shade (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)