Forum:Console Articles: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Bump. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 15:14, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | :Bump. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 15:14, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
::Guys. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 21:13, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | ::Guys. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 21:13, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::^ [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 21:44, 5 August 2011 (EDT) |
Revision as of 21:44, August 5, 2011
Forums: Index → Watercooler → Console Articles
Are they really necessary? Looks like a bunch of unneeded information on top of a chart that could otherwise be explained on character articles. Only three consoles hosted Super Smash Bros. games (N64 - SSB, GCN - SSBM, Wii - SSBB), and even they hold little relevant information other than the charts on their pages. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 23:22, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- I agree. Having articles about key games is one thing, but the console articles are just lists of characters that appeared. Honestly I think the Wii is the only necessary one, as all three games are available on it. Mr. Anon (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- Bump. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 15:14, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- Guys. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 21:13, 5 August 2011 (EDT)