Forum:Competitive history: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#'''Support, leaning towards neutrality'''. As for what Trip is saying below, I do believe we can make articles for the history of competitive Smash 64 and Brawl; 64 has a short but easy to understand history and few things that allow it to not be barebones, while Brawl has quite the history too. An "infamous" one to be exact... heheh... heh... But for real, I also echo Trip in the fact doing them could take some work and nobody wants to write them, because while the story for 64 is easy to understand, it is a bit hard to find the entire history because of the lack of people playing the game. As for Brawl, it is quite lengthy, at seven years, and most points would talk about how Meta Knight was, is and has always been good. On a last note, let's give ''SSB4'' some more time for it to develop, just another tier list, alrite? There's not ENOUGH history for the game yet. --[[File:BeepYouSignature.png|40px]] '''Merry Christ... I mean,''' <font color="Orange">'''Happy Halloween from'''</font> [[User:BeepYou|<font color="Orange">'''BeepYou...'''</font>]] [[User talk:BeepYou|<font color="#A91101">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 18:24, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | #'''Support, leaning towards neutrality'''. As for what Trip is saying below, I do believe we can make articles for the history of competitive Smash 64 and Brawl; 64 has a short but easy to understand history and few things that allow it to not be barebones, while Brawl has quite the history too. An "infamous" one to be exact... heheh... heh... But for real, I also echo Trip in the fact doing them could take some work and nobody wants to write them, because while the story for 64 is easy to understand, it is a bit hard to find the entire history because of the lack of people playing the game. As for Brawl, it is quite lengthy, at seven years, and most points would talk about how Meta Knight was, is and has always been good. On a last note, let's give ''SSB4'' some more time for it to develop, just another tier list, alrite? There's not ENOUGH history for the game yet. --[[File:BeepYouSignature.png|40px]] '''Merry Christ... I mean,''' <font color="Orange">'''Happy Halloween from'''</font> [[User:BeepYou|<font color="Orange">'''BeepYou...'''</font>]] [[User talk:BeepYou|<font color="#A91101">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 18:24, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
#'''Support, leaning to neutral'''. I'm with BeepYou. <span style="font-family:Corbel; font-size:12pt">[[User:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Smash''']] [[User talk:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkgreen">'''Master'''</span>]]</span></span> 19:02, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | #'''Support, leaning to neutral'''. I'm with BeepYou. <span style="font-family:Corbel; font-size:12pt">[[User:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Smash''']] [[User talk:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkgreen">'''Master'''</span>]]</span></span> 19:02, 28 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
#'''Support'''. I'm all with the idea. We could definitely get down SSB4, and while Brawl may be a bit of a ditch, I'm sure there's something for it. As for Smash 64? Well, it can be done, at least. [[File:PikachuMS.png|20px]][[User:ThePikaPlayer|<span style="color: gold;">'''Pika,'''</span>]] [[User Talk:ThePikaPlayer|<span style="color: magenta;">'''Poyo poyo poyo'''</span>]] 16:05, 9 November 2016 (EST) | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
