Talk:Shulk (SSB4): Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
ScoreCounter (talk | contribs) |
ScoreCounter (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
::::Then simply just call him a Nintendo character instead. That should make everyone happy and end this debate.[[Special:Contributions/64.237.228.162|64.237.228.162]] 12:46, 8 April 2015 (EDT) | ::::Then simply just call him a Nintendo character instead. That should make everyone happy and end this debate.[[Special:Contributions/64.237.228.162|64.237.228.162]] 12:46, 8 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::::No, because in the completed title screen, Nintendo gives CLEAR attribution to Monolith for the character. As such, Nintendo don't strictly own all the Copyright as their own entity (Ownership by proxy, in a way). Because of that, calling him Nintendo character isn't... accurate. And, as Miles said, it's not really notable. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 12:51, 8 April 2015 (EDT) | :::::No, because in the completed title screen, Nintendo gives CLEAR attribution to Monolith for the character. As such, Nintendo don't strictly own all the Copyright as their own entity (Ownership by proxy, in a way). Because of that, calling him Nintendo character isn't... accurate. And, as Miles said, it's not really notable. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 12:51, 8 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::::And on this note, can we make the ignorance of hidden notices a third-time blockable offence now? It's getting ridiculous. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 13:15, 4 May 2015 (EDT) | |||
