SmashWiki:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(→‎Clarinet Hawk: almost support.)
Line 44: Line 44:
As for why I should be a sysop, I feel that my [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]] speak for themselves.  I have always maintained a professional manner and writing style.  In addition to these, I have done my part to discuss important issues on both the talk pages and the forums.  In terms of my primary area of gameplay, I am technically advanced player.  While this may seem like a strange thing to determine sysopship based on, I mention it only to prove the fact that should a debate over the effectiveness or existence of a technique arise, I have the means to recreate and test it.  I am also part of a crew that has been able to perform every legitimate technique.  Therefore, I can test almost any proposed technique or strategy to resolve conflict.  Beyond the gameplay elements, my daily checks of the smash wiki occasionally encounter vandalism or other pages that merit deletion.  While I nominate these whenever I see them, it would be more efficient if I had the ability to watch the debate of the pages and delete them myself.  I would still give every page the benefit of the doubt and allow ample time for defense of the page.  As a final note, I have a photographic memory, making it quite easy for me to spot changes to pages and remember names of editors.  This has been invaluable in quickly recognizing vandalism and vandals.  I request to become a sysop so I can do my part to better this great wiki.  Thank you.   
As for why I should be a sysop, I feel that my [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]] speak for themselves.  I have always maintained a professional manner and writing style.  In addition to these, I have done my part to discuss important issues on both the talk pages and the forums.  In terms of my primary area of gameplay, I am technically advanced player.  While this may seem like a strange thing to determine sysopship based on, I mention it only to prove the fact that should a debate over the effectiveness or existence of a technique arise, I have the means to recreate and test it.  I am also part of a crew that has been able to perform every legitimate technique.  Therefore, I can test almost any proposed technique or strategy to resolve conflict.  Beyond the gameplay elements, my daily checks of the smash wiki occasionally encounter vandalism or other pages that merit deletion.  While I nominate these whenever I see them, it would be more efficient if I had the ability to watch the debate of the pages and delete them myself.  I would still give every page the benefit of the doubt and allow ample time for defense of the page.  As a final note, I have a photographic memory, making it quite easy for me to spot changes to pages and remember names of editors.  This has been invaluable in quickly recognizing vandalism and vandals.  I request to become a sysop so I can do my part to better this great wiki.  Thank you.   
*[[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] ([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]]) 21:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
*[[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] ([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]]) 21:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Neutral with strong leaning to support''' - The only reason it's not a full support are all the edits you've made to your page, Slapayo and Slapastick combined with a "low" edit count. Otherwise, I think this candidate would benefit from the tools, and I'm certain he could have used them earlier today. :) --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 03:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)