Talk:Palutena's Guidance

Line 45:

The answer is very little, if nothing at all. If you check the Codec Conversations page, you'll see that the way the scripts are written in a professional looking way. Some of the text, whilst clearly going into seperate text boxes, is merged together until another character starts speaking. What I don't understand is why everyone is so desperate to have the Palutena's Guidance script, which as I said earlier is pretty much the ''exact same thing'' by seperate text boxes? Not only does it look messy and unprofessional, but it is incosistent with how the Codec Conversations, and indeed the SF Taunts, are set-up. If those two don't merge text boxes, neither should this one. [[Special:Contributions/85.210.188.121|85.210.188.121]] 09:07, 26 November 2014 (EST)

:To be honest, I see no reason to separate text boxes between a single character. It's a consistency issue, and while there are a lot of consistency issues between the three Smash Taunt pages, they can easily be fixed. So, I actually like the IP's version better—but you still gotta follow [[SW:1RV]], no matter what I say. [[User:Rtzxy|Rtzxy]] [[File:Reflect.jpg|20x20px]] [[User talk:Rtzxy|''Reflect!'']] 09:39, 26 November 2014 (EST)

Talk:Palutena's Guidance: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Participate

Tools

Revision as of 10:07, November 26, 2014 (edit) 85.210.188.121 (talk) (→‎What is the difference between Palutena's Guidance and the Codec Conversations/Star Fox Smash Taunts?: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:39, November 26, 2014 (edit) (undo) Rtzxy (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tag: Mobile edit Newer edit →
Line 45:		Line 45:

	The answer is very little, if nothing at all. If you check the Codec Conversations page, you'll see that the way the scripts are written in a professional looking way. Some of the text, whilst clearly going into seperate text boxes, is merged together until another character starts speaking. What I don't understand is why everyone is so desperate to have the Palutena's Guidance script, which as I said earlier is pretty much the ''exact same thing'' by seperate text boxes? Not only does it look messy and unprofessional, but it is incosistent with how the Codec Conversations, and indeed the SF Taunts, are set-up. If those two don't merge text boxes, neither should this one. [[Special:Contributions/85.210.188.121\|85.210.188.121]] 09:07, 26 November 2014 (EST)		The answer is very little, if nothing at all. If you check the Codec Conversations page, you'll see that the way the scripts are written in a professional looking way. Some of the text, whilst clearly going into seperate text boxes, is merged together until another character starts speaking. What I don't understand is why everyone is so desperate to have the Palutena's Guidance script, which as I said earlier is pretty much the ''exact same thing'' by seperate text boxes? Not only does it look messy and unprofessional, but it is incosistent with how the Codec Conversations, and indeed the SF Taunts, are set-up. If those two don't merge text boxes, neither should this one. [[Special:Contributions/85.210.188.121\|85.210.188.121]] 09:07, 26 November 2014 (EST)
			:To be honest, I see no reason to separate text boxes between a single character. It's a consistency issue, and while there are a lot of consistency issues between the three Smash Taunt pages, they can easily be fixed. So, I actually like the IP's version better—but you still gotta follow [[SW:1RV]], no matter what I say. <font face="Marker Felt">[[User:Rtzxy\|<span style="color:#9f4f3f;">Rtzxy</span>]] [[File:Reflect.jpg\|20x20px]] [[User talk:Rtzxy\|<span style="color:#66CDAA;">''Reflect!''</span>]]</font> 09:39, 26 November 2014 (EST)