2020 Super Smash Bros. sexual misconduct allegations: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- This article deals with a highly sensitive topic. All information on this page must be cited from a reliable source, and must conform to the rules outlined in SW:NPOV, without exception. -->
<!-- This article deals with a highly sensitive topic. All information on this page must be cited from a reliable source, and must conform to the rules outlined in SW:NPOV, without exception. -->


In July 2020, '''numerous allegations of sexual misconduct''' were risen on over 125 members of the ''Super Smash Bros.'' community, including some of the game's most well-known professional players, commentators, tournament organizers, and content creators. The accusations included instances of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and sexual abuse of minors. The initial response was swift among the Internet, with all of  the ''Super Smash Bros.'' community, the wider eSports scene, major mainstream media outlets, as well as Nintendo, expressing shock and outrage at the allegations. Many of the accused players were banned from entering tournaments and isolated and removed from the community, and discussion was quickly sparked on preventing further misconduct at ''Smash'' events. Since the initial wave, more details have come out regarding a number of cases, some revealed to have been partially or entirely fabricated, reigniting a long held discussion about the greater issues with the ''Smash'' community..
In July 2020, '''numerous allegations of sexual misconduct''' were risen on over 125 members of the ''Super Smash Bros.'' community, including some of the game's most well-known professional players, commentators, tournament organizers, and content creators. The accusations included instances of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and sexual abuse of minors. The initial response was swift among the Internet, with all of  the ''Super Smash Bros.'' community, the wider eSports scene, major mainstream media outlets, as well as Nintendo, expressing shock and outrage at the allegations. Many of the accused players were banned from entering tournaments and isolated and removed from the community, and discussion was quickly sparked on preventing further misconduct at ''Smash'' events. Since the initial wave, more details have come out regarding a number of cases, some revealed to have been partially or entirely fabricated, reigniting a long held discussion about the greater issues with the ''Smash'' community.


==Background==
==Background==
{{incomplete|Still a lot left to cover such as trouble that women had in the community and other cases that had ties to the July 2020 allegations}}
{{incomplete|Still a lot left to cover such as trouble that women had in the community and other cases that had ties to the July 2020 allegations}}
Throughout the 2010s, sexual misconduct allegations had been levied against many notable members in the community, with notable examples being {{Sm|Alex Strife}}, the head TO of the {{Trn|Apex}} series; {{Sm|Lolex}}, the head TO of the {{Trn|B.E.A.S.T|series}} series; and {{Sm|Hyuga}}, the best ''[[Smash 4]]'' {{SSB4|Toon Link}} player at that time. These allegations were often posted on Twitter in the form of a TwitLonger, and consisted of a description of events as well as screenshots of evidence such as text messages and DMs. In addition, other TwitLongers are often posted, usually from the accused and others who were involved in the case. Depending on whether sufficient evidence was provided to prove the accused was guilty, tournament organizers can choose to issue a ban.
Due to the ''Smash'' community's decentralized nature, there has been very little if any oversight on the community's actions, allowing many unruly behaviors to infest it. Women in the community were known victims of sexism due to the majority of tournament attendees being men and the then-rare sight of a woman competing at a high level, something noted by commentators in [[The Smash Brothers]] documentary. However, these issues were yet not known to have escalated further and were largely seen as a symptom of general gaming culture at the time.


However, most incidents that occurred before 2020 were considered isolated and unconnected from each other, and as such aside from severe cases such as Alex Strife, bans were mostly relegated to certain regions or tournament series, which could lead to further controversy over whether a player was allowed to attend an event. This is most notable with Hyuga, who was allowed to compete in Mexico after his one year ban and with some players believing he had served his punishment, but continued to be suspended from several events in the United States, including {{Trn|Clutch City Clash 2}} and events held by {{Team|2GGaming}}, as many other players believed a player like him shouldn't be welcomed back to the community.  
Throughout the 2010s, sexual misconduct allegations had been levied against many notable members in the community, with notable examples being {{Sm|Alex Strife}}, the head TO of the {{Trn|Apex}} series; {{Sm|Lolex}}, the head TO of the {{Trn|B.E.A.S.T|series}} series; and {{Sm|Hyuga}}, the best ''[[Smash 4]]'' {{SSB4|Toon Link}} player at that time. These allegations were often posted on Twitter in the form of a TwitLonger, and consisted of a description of events as well as screenshots of evidence such as text messages and DMs. In addition, other TwitLongers were often posted, usually from the accused and others who were involved in the case. Depending on whether sufficient evidence was provided to prove the accused was guilty, tournament organizers can choose to issue a ban.
 
However, most incidents that occurred before 2020 were considered isolated and unconnected from each other, and as such aside from severe cases such as Alex Strife, bans were mostly relegated to certain regions or tournament series, which could lead to further controversy over whether a player was allowed to attend an event. This was most notable with Hyuga, who was allowed to compete in Mexico after his one year ban and with some players believing he had served his punishment, but continued to be suspended from several events in the United States, including {{Trn|Clutch City Clash 2}} and events held by {{Team|2GGaming}}, as many other players believed a player like him should not be welcomed back to the community.  


There have been attempts to form a unified panel which would investigate allegations and make appropriate decisions, most notably the [[SSB Code of Conduct Panel]], which was formed in 2018. However, decisions from the panel were almost immediately controversial, with their first notable case being a recommendation on unbanning {{Sm|Mafia}}, a choice that was criticized by many tournament organizers.
There have been attempts to form a unified panel which would investigate allegations and make appropriate decisions, most notably the [[SSB Code of Conduct Panel]], which was formed in 2018. However, decisions from the panel were almost immediately controversial, with their first notable case being a recommendation on unbanning {{Sm|Mafia}}, a choice that was criticized by many tournament organizers.
Line 46: Line 48:


==Aftermath==
==Aftermath==
Since the initial wave and ensuing fallout, more information and testimony came out over time that gave more context to the situations described in the allegations.
The Code of Conduct panel received several reports after the allegations were published. They ultimately chose to disband in December 2020, claiming that they "would need five or ten years" to go through every one of them at their current pace.<ref>[https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1srgobs SSBConductPanel - Formal Disbanding of the COC]</ref>


Mr. E challenged the allegations against ANTi in a Twitlonger he posted in late August 2020.<ref>https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1srchqv</ref> He stated that, though ANTi was ultimately at fault for not checking for identification before initiating the sexual encounter, there was no indication that ANTi himself was aware of her age, as per his initial statement. ANTi found her on Tinder, which requires members to be at least 18 years of age to register, so Mr. E concluded that ANTi had little reason to be suspicious until they met in person. Mr. E's statement garnered significant backlash from the community and he would eventually lose his sponsor over it. He would go on to admit that he fully expected backlash but wanted to stand up for what he believed was right.
Since the initial wave and ensuing fallout, more information and testimony came out over time that prompted community members to reevaluate and recontextualize many of the allegations. The first of these came with Mr. E challenging the allegations against ANTi in a Twitlonger he posted in late August 2020.<ref>https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1srchqv</ref> He stated that, though ANTi was ultimately at fault for not checking for identification before initiating the sexual encounter, there was no indication that ANTi himself was aware of her age, as per his initial statement. ANTi found her on Tinder, which requires members to be at least 18 years of age to register, so Mr. E concluded that ANTi had little reason to be suspicious until they met in person. Mr. E's statement garnered significant backlash from the community and he would eventually lose his sponsor over it. He would go on to admit that he fully expected backlash but wanted to stand up for what he believed was right.


ANTi posted his own response to the allegations to his YouTube channel in January 2021, admitting that he was irresponsible and that he should have checked for identification. However, he also noted that he could not open a court subpoena for the messages he exchanged with her on Tinder to verify or deny Samantha's claim that he forced her to lie about her age, as the statute of limitations expired a year before the allegations became public. Nevertheless, he denied that he was a "predator", as he had been running on the assumption that the girl was of legal age, and his actions, even if he came to disapprove of them, were not illegal under Florida law.<ref>{{citeweb|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNUBjiuj6pY|title=ANTi's apology video}}</ref>
ANTi posted his own response to the allegations to his YouTube channel in January 2021, admitting that he was irresponsible and that he should have checked for identification. However, he also noted that he could not open a court subpoena for the messages he exchanged with her on Tinder to verify or deny Samantha's claim that he forced her to lie about her age, as the statute of limitations expired a year before the allegations became public. Nevertheless, he denied that he was a "predator", as he had been running on the assumption that the girl was of legal age, and his actions, even if he came to disapprove of them, were not illegal under Florida law.<ref>{{citeweb|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNUBjiuj6pY|title=ANTi's apology video}}</ref>