User talk:88.67.8.79: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
Right now that section looks pretty bad (at least to me), most of them barely qualify as a notbale Luigi player. Either because they only used him once for sandbagging or because they don't have any great results. Also no smasher has a short explanation why he qualifies as a notable Luigi.  
Right now that section looks pretty bad (at least to me), most of them barely qualify as a notbale Luigi player. Either because they only used him once for sandbagging or because they don't have any great results. Also no smasher has a short explanation why he qualifies as a notable Luigi.  
And Cafe, maybe the only Luigi main with decent results in the past few years (like a 9th place at Kanto 2014 & 2015) is missing.
And Cafe, maybe the only Luigi main with decent results in the past few years (like a 9th place at Kanto 2014 & 2015) is missing.
Another question: In which order should the smashers be listed? By relevance, lexicograhical or grouped by region? Right now Pikachu (SSB) is ordered by relevance, while others are lexicographical or completely random. I think it should be consistent.

Revision as of 05:32, July 24, 2017

Hi!

Policy.png Reminder: When adding players to the notable players section of the character pages, please also add a brief description regarding the player's accomplishments with the character, or their contributions to the character's metagame.

Please read the message above. Thanks! Disaster Flare Disaster Flare signature image.png (talk) 18:39, 23 July 2017 (EDT)

Another thing, please don't gloss over your edits, they need to be of acceptable quality, as outlined in our manual of style. Please take the time to read it, and make sure all your edits conform to this. Thank you. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 19:16, 23 July 2017 (EDT)

Hi! How do you think the notable player for Luigi in SSB64 should look like? What qualifies a player to be notable? Something like winning a set at a major in Top 32 using Luigi? For example Isai played Luigi at Super Smash Con 2016 loser's finals against Wizzrobe in 2 games (and lost because of it). Does that qualify him to be listed? Right now that section looks pretty bad (at least to me), most of them barely qualify as a notbale Luigi player. Either because they only used him once for sandbagging or because they don't have any great results. Also no smasher has a short explanation why he qualifies as a notable Luigi. And Cafe, maybe the only Luigi main with decent results in the past few years (like a 9th place at Kanto 2014 & 2015) is missing.

Another question: In which order should the smashers be listed? By relevance, lexicograhical or grouped by region? Right now Pikachu (SSB) is ordered by relevance, while others are lexicographical or completely random. I think it should be consistent.