Forum:ESRB Leak: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
TheNuttyOne (talk | contribs) (New Page: (I'm pretty sure this already exists, and if it does feel free to delete it, but I couldn't find it, so I'm making it to be sure)<br> This board is for general discussion of the ESRB le...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Smash 4 Talk}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | |||
(I'm pretty sure this already exists, and if it does feel free to delete it, but I couldn't find it, so I'm making it to be sure)<br> | (I'm pretty sure this already exists, and if it does feel free to delete it, but I couldn't find it, so I'm making it to be sure)<br> | ||
This board is for general discussion of the ESRB leak, the roster it revealed, and theories on why it may or may not be real. | This board is for general discussion of the ESRB leak, the roster it revealed, and theories on why it may or may not be real. | ||
My personal belief is that it's mostly real, but I'm unsure about parts of it. On one hand, it may be an incomplete version of the roster (there are only 48 characters on it- if they had two more it would be the speculated amount of 50). But, ROB and Dark Pit seem a little odd to me. ROB looks like a recolor of his MKDS art, and I can't imagine they'd choose him over the Climbers (but they're one of my mains in ROB isn't, so I'm a bit biased). I can't imagine that they would show Dark Pit in Palutena's trailer but not reveal him if he was a playable character, right? What do you guys think? '''[[User:Nutta Butta|...a new Nutta]]'''[[File:Nutta's Mallo sig.png]]'''[[User talk:Nutta Butta|is approaching...]]''' 13:00, 1 September 2014 (EDT) | My personal belief is that it's mostly real, but I'm unsure about parts of it. On one hand, it may be an incomplete version of the roster (there are only 48 characters on it- if they had two more it would be the speculated amount of 50). But, ROB and Dark Pit seem a little odd to me. ROB looks like a recolor of his MKDS art, and I can't imagine they'd choose him over the Climbers (but they're one of my mains in ROB isn't, so I'm a bit biased). I can't imagine that they would show Dark Pit in Palutena's trailer but not reveal him if he was a playable character, right? What do you guys think? '''[[User:Nutta Butta|...a new Nutta]]'''[[File:Nutta's Mallo sig.png]]'''[[User talk:Nutta Butta|is approaching...]]''' 13:00, 1 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
:There's no basis whatsoever as far as I can tell to dispute the legitimacy of the videos. As for the screenshots, they are likely legitimate as well, although I am fairly sure the character select screen was not complete. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 13:15, 1 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
::One person claimed that Shulk was just a hack of Marth, with the proof being his up special being nearly identical. Of course, [[Shulk (SSB4)|that's been disproven]]. Really, Shulk's confirmation leaves them with little proof that it's fake. '''[[User:Nutta Butta|...a new Nutta]]'''[[File:Nutta's Mallo sig.png]]'''[[User talk:Nutta Butta|is approaching...]]''' 13:25, 1 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::Though I used to dismiss the whole leak as fake, I started to accept it after hearing about what happened after the leaked videos were taken down. Though I'm glad that Shulk's inclusion is confirmed, I'm still taking the rest of the leak--mainly, the image of the roster--with a bit of salt. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 13:31, 1 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:31, September 1, 2014
Forums: Index → Smash 4 Talk → ESRB Leak
(I'm pretty sure this already exists, and if it does feel free to delete it, but I couldn't find it, so I'm making it to be sure)
This board is for general discussion of the ESRB leak, the roster it revealed, and theories on why it may or may not be real.
My personal belief is that it's mostly real, but I'm unsure about parts of it. On one hand, it may be an incomplete version of the roster (there are only 48 characters on it- if they had two more it would be the speculated amount of 50). But, ROB and Dark Pit seem a little odd to me. ROB looks like a recolor of his MKDS art, and I can't imagine they'd choose him over the Climbers (but they're one of my mains in ROB isn't, so I'm a bit biased). I can't imagine that they would show Dark Pit in Palutena's trailer but not reveal him if he was a playable character, right? What do you guys think? ...a new Nutta
is approaching... 13:00, 1 September 2014 (EDT)
- There's no basis whatsoever as far as I can tell to dispute the legitimacy of the videos. As for the screenshots, they are likely legitimate as well, although I am fairly sure the character select screen was not complete. Miles (talk) 13:15, 1 September 2014 (EDT)
- One person claimed that Shulk was just a hack of Marth, with the proof being his up special being nearly identical. Of course, that's been disproven. Really, Shulk's confirmation leaves them with little proof that it's fake. ...a new Nutta
is approaching... 13:25, 1 September 2014 (EDT)
- Though I used to dismiss the whole leak as fake, I started to accept it after hearing about what happened after the leaked videos were taken down. Though I'm glad that Shulk's inclusion is confirmed, I'm still taking the rest of the leak--mainly, the image of the roster--with a bit of salt. Berrenta (talk) 13:31, 1 September 2014 (EDT)
- One person claimed that Shulk was just a hack of Marth, with the proof being his up special being nearly identical. Of course, that's been disproven. Really, Shulk's confirmation leaves them with little proof that it's fake. ...a new Nutta
