Talk:Latias & Latios: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (Diddy Kongstar moved page Talk:Latias and Latios to Talk:Latias & Latios: Consistency with other duo pages) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Is this better? [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:17, 13 November 2010 (EST) | Is this better? [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:17, 13 November 2010 (EST) | ||
:While I think an external link section with standard links would have sufficed, you got rid of those unsightly and intrusive boxes while keeping the link in an appropriate place. So yes, this is much better. <span style="font-family:Vijaya; font-size:12pt">[[User:Garo108|<span style="color:brown">Garo</span>]][[User talk:Garo108|<span style="color:lightgreen">108</span>]]</span> 19:29, 13 November 2010 (EST) | |||
::Better.--<span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|20px|:p]] 19:41, 13 November 2010 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:07, March 23, 2023
[1] Where are you seeing that it "screws up the formatting"? Miles (talk) 14:12, 13 November 2010 (EST)
- This is not what I saw. Before I made my first edit, and after you made your last edit, the image of Lati@s preparing to attack intruded into the trivia section, and the trivia section had three edit buttons on it, caused by the original placement of the Bulbapedia links. Garo108 14:23, 13 November 2010 (EST)
- Is this a computer-to-computer issue? Ought the boxes be moved back up? Miles (talk) 14:35, 13 November 2010 (EST)
- Perhaps it is a computer-to-computer issue, but I'm not using a computer that would be unusual, so I'm sure others would see the page as I did, and where the Bulbapedia boxes are now don't screw up the format of the page on my screen, as I'm sure they don't for you either, and are above the templates at the bottom. So I say keep them where they are now unless you can put them in a place that doesn't cause the viewing problems for me that the original placement of the boxes did. Though I will say the Bulbapedia boxes look out of place in both their original and current position, and imo, the Bulbapedia links would look better and more fitting in an external link section as a standard link instead of in those unsightly and space consuming boxes. Garo108 14:55, 13 November 2010 (EST)
- Is this a computer-to-computer issue? Ought the boxes be moved back up? Miles (talk) 14:35, 13 November 2010 (EST)
