Editing User talk:RTV

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
This is a talk page. Remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) and follow the talk page policy.
Warning You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 57: Line 57:


Hope that explains it. [[User:RTV|RTV]] ([[User talk:RTV#top|talk]]) 22:41, August 17, 2021 (EDT)RTV
Hope that explains it. [[User:RTV|RTV]] ([[User talk:RTV#top|talk]]) 22:41, August 17, 2021 (EDT)RTV
I do understand that you want to get MVD and ESAM's controversies up, and I agree that both have done some very suspicious things in the past, particularly with the KTDominate situation, which I believe MVD deserves blame for. However, the TwitLonger you added to both MVD and ESAM is incredibly fishy. First, the person who made the TwitLonger isn't even involved with the situation ("I’m not directly involved with this incident and therefore I don’t know everything there is") and they're basing the TwitLonger over how they interpret the alleged "evidence." The "evidence" usually just points to either a he-said she-said situation or just someone's take on the situation. This is especially apparent with the accusation against MVD, where the evidence that MVD was a groomer was simply a few people on Twitter talking about what D1 said in his statement. Finally, the TwitLonger's accusation on ESAM is also just weird, and they're talking about as if they know who ESAM is personally ("But that’s NOT something 2016 ESAM would have done") as using that assumption to judge his choice.
In short, the TwitLonger is most likely from someone outside of the situation trying to create a narrative to get negative attention on the two, and due to this it shouldn't be used on the wiki as a source for the controversy. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 11:22, February 19, 2022 (EST)


==Infobox characters==
==Infobox characters==

Please note that all contributions to SmashWiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see SmashWiki:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: