Editing User talk:MuteSpittah
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
::::Already done. Just try to get a solid idea of the problem before jumping in, okay? [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah#top|talk]]) 02:12, 11 August 2016 (EDT) | ::::Already done. Just try to get a solid idea of the problem before jumping in, okay? [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah#top|talk]]) 02:12, 11 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
''"Don't put the blame just on me when you had all the power to discuss it too..."'' | |||
I guess you're right, yet blaming people for the same actions you made is ironical, eh? | I guess you're right, yet blaming people for the same actions you made is ironical, eh? | ||
''"We both broke a rule, great, but don't come in here pointing a finger when you haven't rightly pointed one at yourself."'' | |||
I don't have to, because I never broke the rule. | I don't have to, because I never broke the rule. | ||
''"...what you were putting was blatantly false information..."'' | |||
I realized it wasn't blatantly false, but rather false in a non-malicious way. It did look like dull green to me. Her vambraces, her lower dress, her hair. | I realized it wasn't blatantly false, but rather false in a non-malicious way. It did look like dull green to me. Her vambraces, her lower dress, her hair. | ||
''"...you made no attempt to provide reasons to support your reasoning..."'' | |||
I did! They were on my edit summary! | I did! They were on my edit summary! | ||
''"I was actually right to revert your edits."'' | |||
On one side, yes. If I was putting wrong info, you can. But on the other side, no. Because you broke the rule instead of just editing an old version of the page. | On one side, yes. If I was putting wrong info, you can. But on the other side, no. Because you broke the rule instead of just editing an old version of the page. | ||
''"I was referring to the part in SW:1RV that says there is an exception "For obviously false information, such as a user adding Mewtwo as a character in Brawl, this rule does not apply.""'' | |||
Like I said, it wasn't obviously false. It was false in a non-malicious way, like Disaster Flare said. | Like I said, it wasn't obviously false. It was false in a non-malicious way, like Disaster Flare said. | ||
''"I know there were times where I was being stupid..."'' | |||
Not stupid, but stubborn. | Not stupid, but stubborn. | ||
''"I shoulda saw it coming that he wasn't willing to prove it or talk it out..."'' | |||
YES I WAS! That's why I initiated this conversation on your talk page! I just did it late, that's all! | YES I WAS! That's why I initiated this conversation on your talk page! I just did it late, that's all! | ||
''"I should have initiated talking on my own accord..."'' | |||
When? When edit warring becomes noticeable and an admin points it out for both of us? | When? When edit warring becomes noticeable and an admin points it out for both of us? | ||
''"I hope you and Disaster actually gave this situation a proper analysis prior to jumping into this dilemma."'' | |||
Wow, rude. --[[File:BeepYouSignature.png|50px]] [[User:BeepYou|<font color="Black">'''BeepYou'''</font>]]''': is he leaving the wiki?''' [[User talk:BeepYou|<font color="Black">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 16:48, 11 August 2016 (EDT) | Wow, rude. --[[File:BeepYouSignature.png|50px]] [[User:BeepYou|<font color="Black">'''BeepYou'''</font>]]''': is he leaving the wiki?''' [[User talk:BeepYou|<font color="Black">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 16:48, 11 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
:I may or may not be fueling the fire right now, and I'm not going to address everything you said above, but just to be clear, a statement can be both obviously false and non-malicious. Like a kid can say that Santa Claus / the Easter Bunny is real. Or if you're just learning about times tables and say that 3 times 9 is 12. Or, sometimes when you're cracking jokes or being sarcastic (at least when you're not trying to tear someone down). An obviously false and non-malicious statement usually comes about from some sort of misunderstanding or misconception, which I'd say is what happened here. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah#top|talk]]) 22:48, 11 August 2016 (EDT) | :I may or may not be fueling the fire right now, and I'm not going to address everything you said above, but just to be clear, a statement can be both obviously false and non-malicious. Like a kid can say that Santa Claus / the Easter Bunny is real. Or if you're just learning about times tables and say that 3 times 9 is 12. Or, sometimes when you're cracking jokes or being sarcastic (at least when you're not trying to tear someone down). An obviously false and non-malicious statement usually comes about from some sort of misunderstanding or misconception, which I'd say is what happened here. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah#top|talk]]) 22:48, 11 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
